两种回潮率测试方法在新疆监管棉中应用比较  

Application comparison of two moisture regain test methods in supervision cotton of Xinjiang

作　　者：邱迎风 张小建[1] QIU Yingfeng;ZHANG Xiaojian(Aksu Fiber Inspection Institute,Aksu,Xinjiang 84300,China)

机构地区：[1]阿克苏地区纤维检验所,新疆维吾尔自治区阿克苏843000

出　　处：《中国纤检》2024年第9期55-57,共3页China Fiber Inspection

摘　　要：为了比较不同回潮率测试方法的应用效果,利用插入式电测器法MBS-2型棉包水分测定仪和微波法棉包回潮率测试装备AT-MBC-212D1,对从全国棉花交易市场采购的低、中、高回潮率的558包皮棉进行回潮率测试,并分析结果,得出:两种方法对于低、高回潮率水平的棉包测试数据差异不显著,MBS-2型棉包水分测定仪测试数据更稳定,尤其在测试高回潮率棉包时,MBS-2型棉包水分测定仪的稳定性更为突出,而微波法测得的数据波动更大,为棉花公证检验机构选择回潮率测试装置与回潮率仪器研发和改进提供参考。In order to determine the effect difference,advantages and disadvantages of different moisture regain testing methods,MBS-2 moisture tester and AT-MBC-212D1 moisture regain tester were used to test low,medium and high moisture regain of 558 baled cotton purchased from national cotton market,the results of moisture regain were compared and analyzed.The results showed that there was no significant difference between the two methods for the test data of cotton bales with low and high moisture regain,and the test data of MBS-2 cotton bales moisture tester was more stable,especially for the test of cotton bales with high moisture regain,the stability of MBS-2 cotton bag moisture meter is more outstanding,and the data measured by microwave method fluctuates more greatly.According to this,the cotton notary inspection institution can choose the suitable moisture regain testing device,and provide reference for the development and improvement of the moisture regain instrument of cotton bag.

关 键 词：回潮率 MBS法 微波法 

分 类 号：TS107[轻工技术与工程—纺织工程]