检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘冠启 花家涛[1] LIU Guanqi;HUA Jiatao(School of Physical Education,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241002,China)
出 处:《体育学刊》2024年第5期22-28,共7页Journal of Physical Education
基 金:安徽省高等学校科学研究重大项目(2023AH040018)。
摘 要:探究体育人类学研究的史学转向问题,需在跨学科视角下,从学科概念、方法与范式出发,反思其方法论的局限性,继而阐明史学思维对推动体育人类学研究方法论变革的重要意义。研究认为体育人类学研究的史学转向提供重新认知体育研究对象的方法,拓展勾连体育文化与中国文化的研究视野,更迭体育文化行为解释的研究范式,提供以微观体育管窥社会结构变迁的叙事方法。以上述方法论为指引开展体育人类学研究,形成田野经验在历史上的延续性,不仅在空间维度上深化对微观体育行为的文化叙事,而且在时间维度上强化体育文化的历史过程叙事,继而为体育人类学整体性研究提供新的思考,推进体育人类学研究的本土化、体系化发展。To explore the problem of historical turn with the research on the sports anthropology,it is necessary to reflect on the limitations of the methodology from the interdisciplinary perspective,from the concept,method and paradigm of the discipline,and then the paper expounds the significance of historical thinking in promoting the change of research methodology of sports anthropology.The research holds that the historical turn of the research on the sports anthropology provides a method to re-recognize the object of sports research,expanding the research vision of linking sports culture and Chinese culture,changing the research paradigm of sports cultural behavior interpretation,and providing a narrative method to observe the changes of social structure through micro sports.The research of sports anthropology under the guidance of the above methodology forms the historical continuity of field experience,not only deepens the cultural narration of micro sports behavior in spatial dimension,but also strengthens the historical process narration of sports culture in time dimension,and then provides new thinking for the overall research of sports anthropology and promotes the localization and systematization development.
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49