检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄婷[1] 许叶涛 蒋玲玲[2] 孙丽洲[1] 潘义[1] HUANG Ting;XU Yetao;JIANG Lingling;SUN Lizhou;PAN Yi(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210029,China)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学第一附属医院产科,江苏南京210029 [2]南通市第一人民医院产科,江苏南通226001
出 处:《中国临床研究》2024年第9期1408-1411,1427,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(82001578);江苏省科学技术协会江苏省科协青年科技人才托举工程(JSTJ-2023-WJ020);江苏省妇幼健康青年人才项目(FRC202151)。
摘 要:目的探讨影响双胎妊娠分娩方式的因素。方法回顾性分析2006年6月至2019年10月于南京医科大学第一附属医院产科分娩的2085例双胎妊娠产妇临床资料,根据分娩方式的不同分为剖宫产组1376例和生理产组709例。通过分析双胎妊娠孕妇的危险因素与分娩方式的关系,总结影响双胎妊娠分娩方式的相关因素。结果相较于生理产组,剖宫产组中产妇的平均年龄较高,初产妇比例明显增加(P<0.01),自然受孕的孕妇比例差异明显(P<0.01),且有子宫手术史的孕妇均选择剖宫产终止妊娠;剖宫产组双绒毛膜双羊膜囊(DCDA)比例低于生理产组(P<0.01)。妊娠合并症及并发症方面,剖宫产组子痫前期率显著升高;同时发现,剖宫产组早产发生率高于生理产组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。剖宫产组中产后出血率高于生理产组,第一胎和第二胎的低体重儿比例明显高于生理产组;但剖宫产组中第二胎新生儿重度窒息率、死胎率低于生理产组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。剖宫产组和生理产组第一胎发生窒息及死亡的概率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论年龄、子宫手术史、子痫前期等是双胎妊娠分娩方式的重要影响因素。Objective To explore the factors affecting the mode of delivery in twin pregnancies.Methods Clinical data of 2085 pregnant women with twin pregnancy who were delivered in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from June 2006 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different delivery modes,1376 cases were divided into cesarean section group and 709 cases were divided into natural delivery group.The general prenatal conditions,pregnancy complications and pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were analyzed.Results Compared with the natural delivery group,the average age of pregnant women in the cesarean section group was higher,the proportion of primipara was significantly increased(P<0.01),and the proportion of pregnant women who conceived naturally was significantly different(P<0.01).All pregnant women with a history of uterine surgery chose cesarean section to terminate pregnancy.The rate of dichorionic diamniotic(DCDA)twins in the cesarean section group was lower than that in the natural delivery group(P<0.01).In terms of pregnancy complications and complications,the rate of preeclampsia in the cesarean section group was significantly higher;at the same time,it was found that the incidence rate of preterm birth in the cesarean section group was also significantly higher than that in the natural delivery group,with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).The rate of postpartum hemorrhage in the cesarean section group was higher than that in the natural delivery group,and the proportion of low birth weight infants in the first and second fetuses was significantly higher than that in the natural delivery group.However,the severe asphyxia rate and stillbirth rate of the second newborn in the cesarean section group were lower than those in the natural birth group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the probability of first fetal asphyxia and death between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Age,hist
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222