“其他类”司法鉴定管理的困境与改革  

The Dilemma and Reform on Forensic Appraisal in the“Other Categories”Management

作　　者：陈喆 CHEN Zhe(Faculty of Law,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266071,China)

机构地区：[1]青岛大学法学院,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《中国司法鉴定》2024年第4期10-20,共11页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences

基　　金：青岛市社会科学规划项目(QDSKL2001097);山东省社会科学规划研究项目(22DFXJ03)。

摘　　要：目前,在司法行政部门统一管理的“四大类”司法鉴定外,尚有数量庞大的“其他类”司法鉴定。“其他类”司法鉴定存在公信力不足、适用混乱、与现有证据规定矛盾和管理与使用缺位等问题。而上位法缺失、司法行政部门管理力量不足、法院的制度掣肘和行业管理收效甚微又使得司法行政部门的统一管理面临困境。为此,要通过统一司法鉴定立法、采取渐进措施推进、强化行业管理力量以及完善司法鉴定管理与使用衔接,以实现“其他类”司法鉴定统一管理的改革目标。At present,besides the forensic appraisal in the“Four Categories”under the management of judicial administrative departments,there are still a large number of forensic appraisal in the“other categories”.The forensic appraisal in the“other categories”have many problems such as insufficient credibility,confusion in application,contradictions with existing evidence regulations,and lack of combination of appraisal management and application.The absence of superior laws,insufficient management capabilities of judicial administrative departments,institutional constraints of the courts,and limited effectiveness in industry management have all posed challenges to the unified management of judicial administrative departments.To achieve the reform goal of unified management of forensic appraisal in the“other categories”,it is necessary to unify legislation on forensic appraisal,take gradual measures to push the unification of forensic appraisal management,strengthen industry management and improve the connection between forensic appraisal management and application.

关 键 词：“其他类”司法鉴定 司法鉴定管理 司法行政部门 

分 类 号：DF8[政治法律—法学]