检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董一凡[1] Dong Yifan
机构地区:[1]中国现代国际关系研究院欧洲研究所
出 处:《现代国际关系》2024年第9期83-102,142,143,共22页
基 金:国家社科基金项目“世界能源结构变化及其地缘政治影响研究”(项目号:23BGJ039)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:近几年来,在新的地缘政治格局和产业变局影响下,欧盟在经历新冠疫情、乌克兰危机等多重危机后,既有的经贸保护主义传统显现出延续和升级的趋势,呈现政策工具多样化、覆盖范围扩大化、泛安全化及泛意识形态化等新特征,在动用反补贴调查工具、促进投资、技术贸易政策收紧等方面动作频出。此种态势的原因复杂多样,其中包括政治加速右转、地缘政治和价值观竞争思维影响扩大以及战略自主目标下的自我保护取向。作为全球最重要的经贸行为体之一,欧盟向保护主义急速靠拢使其自身发展受到反噬,也有损其与中国等贸易伙伴的双边经贸关系乃至全球经济产业格局。In response to the shifting geopolitical landscape and technological advancements, the EU has witnessed a notable intensification in its economic and trade protectionist measures. These have manifested in several distinctive ways, including the diversification of policy instruments, the expansion of coverage, the embrace of a pan-security and pan-ideological approach. The reasons for this trend are complex and diverse, including the rise of radical right politics, geopolitical tensions, and the self-protection orientation for pursuing strategic autonomy. As one of the most important economic and trade actors in the world, the EU's move toward protectionism not only affects its development, but also undermines its bilateral economic and trade relations with trading partners such as China and even the global economic and industrial structure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7