论人工智能生成内容的独创性  

On Whether AI-Generated Content Meets the Originality Requirement in Copyright Law

作　　者：刘煜崝 Liu Yuzheng

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《电子知识产权》2024年第8期4-15,共12页Electronics Intellectual Property

摘　　要：人工智能生成内容是否具备独创性,关涉独创性的来源和创造性的标准两个方面,即著作权法上的独创性是否只能来源于人,以及应遵循何种创造性判断标准。独创性概念之所以被引入著作权法,是因为其以浪漫主义作者观和个人主义作品观为预设,能够满足确定性、重复性、创作友好性等无形财产的本质要求,从而证立权利对象。一旦割裂作品与人的关联,规范目的则无法实现,“来源于人”因故构成独创性的隐性要件。但是,上述预设实为观念建构,与社会现实存在一定差距,法律只能通过不断淡化“天才”“灵感”等浪漫因子,实现对该矛盾的调和。现行的最低限度创造性标准就是这一过程的产物,以表达性要素基本来源于人为适用前提。由于人工智能生成内容同时包括用户和AI贡献部分,所以无法直接适用这一标准。因此,进行独创性判断时,应返回概念的基本原理,对用户贡献部分能否揭示无体财产本质以证立著作权对象展开具体分析。The question regarding whether AI-generated content satisfies the originality requirement hinges on two crucial considerations.Firstly,is originality in copyright law exclusively attributed to human?Secondly,what standard of creation should be followed to determine whether it constitutes a work?The concept of originality is introduced into the copyright law,because it presupposes by romantic authors and individualistic works,which can satisfy the essential requirements of intangible property such as certainty,repeatability and creation friendly,so as to justify copyright.Once the connection between works and human beings is severed,the normative purpose cannot be achieved.Therefore,originating from somebody constitutes the hidden element of originality.However,the above presupposition is a conceptual construction,and there is a certain gap with the social reality.Hence,copyright law has to dilute the romantic factors such as genius and inspiration so that contradiction can be reconciled.The current standard of creativity which based on the premise that expressive elements are basically derived from human is the product of this process.Given AI-generated content includes both user and AI contributions,the existing creativity standard cannot be directly applied.Accordingly,when judging originality,we should turn to the basic principle of concept,and conduct a specific analysis on whether the user contribution can reveal the essence of intangible property to justify copyright.

关 键 词：人工智能生成内容 独创性 浪漫主义作者观 最低限度创造性 创作 

分 类 号：D997.1[政治法律—国际法学] D913[政治法律—法学] TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程]