检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:白小平 戴佳鹏 BAI Xiaoping;DAI Jiapeng(Law School,Lanzhou University of Technology,Lanzhou 730050,China)
出 处:《合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第5期10-18,共9页Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(22BFX113)。
摘 要:数字时代,智能手机中的各类APP应用成为个人数据活动的主要媒介,但部分APP却将用户视为其管理的对象,诱导用户授权,过度收集用户数据,这不仅对个人数据保护构成了威胁,也造成了“困在系统中的人”的情况。APP应用与用户间不平等特征所导致的APP数据权力与用户数据权益之间、平台泛利润化与个人数据保护固守之间、立法规则分散与APP复杂运行环境之间的冲突难以仅从私法角度进行解决,亟需构建综合性的规则治理系统。文章提出为APP应用方设定个人数据保护守则作为其行动指南,从APP应用规则、平台活动规则以及立法规则三个方面完善具体的治理措施,以实现个人数据保护与利用的平衡,进而推动数字化社会的健康发展。In the digital era,various kinds of APPs on smartphones have become the major media for personal data-related activities,but some APPs have problems like misled authorization and data over-collection,making users the subjects of APPs management,which not only poses a threat to personal data protection,but also causes the situation of“trapped in the system”.Inequality between APPs and users leads to the conflicts between data powers of APPs and the data rights of users,pan-monetization of platforms and conformity to personal data protection,scattered legislative rules and complicated operating environment for APPs.It is difficult to resolve these conflicts only by means of private law.Thus,it is imperative to build a comprehensive rule governance system.In this paper,some suggestions are put forward,including setting personal data protection principles for APPs as their guide for action,striking a balance between personal data protection and utilization and promoting the healthy development of digital society in three ways:APPs management rules,platform behavior rules and legislative rules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.190.254