检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗钰雯 LUO Yu-wen(School of Law,Hainan University,Haikou 570228,Hainan,China)
出 处:《喀什大学学报》2024年第4期60-66,共7页Journal of Kashi University
摘 要:法秩序统一性是违法判断的前提和基础。在民刑衔接较为频繁的侵犯已公开公民个人信息行为中,缓和的违法一元论立场以重视前置法的适用、出罪时间点提前、保持刑法谦抑性等优势,相较于违法相对论更加合理。从法秩序统一的视角审视现有已公开个人信息处理行为的违法性判断方法,合理处理规则契合了各部门法协同的要求,但存在判断模糊等问题;客观开放程度标准提出了较为固定的判断路径,但难以避免形式化导致的认定僵化。本论文以法秩序统一原则作为论述的视角与前提,站在缓和的违法一元论立场,对不同的已公开个人信息处理行为之合法性判断方法进行评述,提出场景化法益观下的合理处理方法,并通过分析相关典型案例,引出实践中在认定侵犯公民个人信息罪的特殊问题与法治理念,进而厘清已公开个人信息处理行为的刑法保护范围、定罪路径、认定标准,及其刑法规制中的利益冲突和价值取向等问题。The unity of law order is the premise and basis of judging violations.In the frequent infringement of disclosed citizens’personal information,the moderating illegal monism is more reasonable than the theory of relative illegality with the advantages of attaching importance to the application of the preceding law,advancing the time point of crime,and maintaining the modesty of the criminal law.From the perspective of unified legal order,the existing methods for judging the illegality of handling disclosed personal information are examined.The reasonable handling rules meet the requirements of the coordination of laws of various departments,but there are many problems such as ambiguity in judgment.The degree of objective openness proposes a relatively fixed judgment path for the standard,but it is difficult to avoid the rigidity of the determination caused by formalization.Based on the perspective and premise of the principle of the unity of legal order,this paper reviews different methods for judging the legality of the processing of disclosed personal information from the standpoint of alleviating the unification of illegal monism.This paper proposes a reasonable treatment method under the scenario based legal benefit concept.Through the analysis of relevant typical cases,it introduces the special problems and the concept of the rule of law in determining the crime of infringing on citizens'personal information in practice,in order to clarify the scope of criminal law protection,the conviction path,the identification standard,and the conflict of interest and value orientation in the criminal law system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147