检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁汉兴 YUAN Han-xing(Law School,Chengdu University,Chengdu 610106,Sichuan,China)
出 处:《喀什大学学报》2024年第4期67-74,共8页Journal of Kashi University
基 金:重庆市社科规划一般项目“大数据疫情防控背景下个人信息报道边界研究”(2022NDYB112)。
摘 要:媒体对司法的监督,建立在坚实的法理与规范基础之上。这种监督不仅有助于司法责任制的切实执行,更是司法公开原则的有力贯彻,为司法民主的实现开辟了一条有效途径。然而,媒体监督司法面临敏感信息泄露、虚假报道、“媒体审判”等诸多现实困境。为了发挥媒体对司法的监督作用,需要从四个方面进行制度构建:一是构建敏感信息审查机制;二是构建媒体监督庭审直播制度;三是畅通司法案件采访报道渠道;四是划定媒体监督司法的法律边界。通过这四个方面的制度构建,可以更好地发挥媒体在司法监督中的积极作用,为司法公正、公平、公开的实现提供有力保障。Media supervision of the judiciary has legal and normative bases.Media supervision of the judiciary is beneficial to the implementation of the judicial responsibility system,is the result of strictly following the principle of judicial openness,and is an effective way to achieve judicial democracy.However,media supervision of the judiciary faces many practical challenges such as sensitive information leaks,false reporting,and“media trials”.In order to leverage the media’s supervisory role in the judiciary,institutional construction needs to be carried out from four aspects:firstly,establishing a mechanism for reviewing sensitive information;Secondly,establish a system for media supervision of live court hearings;Thirdly,smooth channels for interviewing and reporting on judicial cases;The fourth is to delineate the legal boundaries of media supervision of the judiciary.Through the construction of these four institutional aspects,the positive role of the media in judicial supervision can be better played,providing strong guarantees for the realization of judicial fairness,impartiality,and openness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7