检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴松强[1,2] 王鹏程 马硕 王雨悦 Wu Songqiang;Wang Pengcheng;Ma Shuo;Wang Yuyue(Nanjing Tech University School of Economics&Management,Nanjing 211800,China;Industrial Institute of Zhangjiagang,Nanjing Tech University,Suzhou 215600,China)
机构地区:[1]南京工业大学经济与管理学院,江苏南京211800 [2]南京工业大学张家港产业学院,江苏苏州215600
出 处:《科技管理研究》2024年第16期1-13,共13页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“集成电路产业集群韧性测度、影响因素与提升路径研究”(21BJY020);江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目“中国式现代化江苏新实践:新兴行业产业链供应链韧性与安全水平研究”(2024SJZD055);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目“供应链数字化转型对企业能源韧性的微观经济效应评估”(KYCX24_1654)。
摘 要:开展集成电路产业政策量化评价是保障产业政策科学制定与有效实施的前提,也是产业政策调整与完善的重要依据。为了解中国集成电路产业政策关注重点的演进以及当前存在的缺陷和不足,通过文本挖掘、社会网络分析和隐含狄利克雷分布主题模型挖掘政策文本的内容特征、结构特征及主题特征,结合以往研究建立PMC-AE指数模型对新发展格局背景下中国集成电路产业的中央和地方政策进行量化评价,最后提出产业政策的优化路径。研究发现:国家级和省级的政策文本等级均为Ⅰ级,地市级和区县级的政策文本等级集中于Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级,反映出国家级和省级政策文本注重规划引领作用的发挥,而地市级和区县级政策文本更为关注某一具体政策措施和方案的制定与落实。总体而言,各级集成电路产业政策总体合理,但也存在缺乏预测性与监督性、缺乏政策对象的协同联动、缺乏需求型政策工具的充分使用等问题。健全产业政策体系、延伸政策涉及领域、强化政策对象协同、完善政策工具组合等是新发展格局下中国集成电路产业政策蝶变的重要路径。Carrying out quantitative evaluation of integrated circuit(IC)industrial policy is the premise of ensuring scientific formulation and effective implementation of industrial policy.It is also an important basis for industrial policy adjustment and improvement.To understand the evolution of China's IC industry policy focus and the current defects and deficiencies,this paper uses text mining,social network analysis,and latent dirichlet allocation model to uncover the content,structural,and thematic features of China's IC industry policy.Combined with previous studies,a PMCAE index model is established to quantitatively evaluate the central and local policies of China's IC industry under the background of the new development pattern.Finally,the optimization path of industrial policies is proposed.Results show that the policy texts at the national and provincial levels are both classified as level Ⅰ,while those at the municipal and district/county levels are concentrated at levels Ⅱ and Ⅲ.This reflects that national and provincial policy texts emphasize the role of strategic planning,whereas municipal and district/county-level texts focus more on the formulation and implementation of specific policy measures and plans.While integrated circuit industry policies at various levels are generally well-structured,they face challenges such as limited predictability and oversight,insufficient coordination and alignment of policy targets,and underutilization of demand-driven policy tools.Under the new development pattern,enhancing the transformation of China's integrated circuit industry policy requires improving the industrial policy system,broadening policy coverage,strengthening coordination among policy targets,and refining the combination of policy tools.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.225.144