检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈秀莲[1] 侯雨欣 Chen Xiulian;Hou Yuxin(China-ASEAN School of Economics/School of Economics/China-ASEAN School of Financial Cooperation,Guangxi University,Nanning 530003,China)
机构地区:[1]广西大学中国-东盟经济学院/经济学院/中国-东盟金融合作学院,广西南宁530003
出 处:《科技管理研究》2024年第16期23-35,共13页Science and Technology Management Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目“中国-东盟服务贸易开放对中国制造业服务化的效应研究——要素‘三维’流动的视角”(72263002);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“CAFTA升级视域下中国制造业服务化的发展研究:驱动机理、壁垒与政策建议”(20XJAGJW001)。
摘 要:为深化“中国-东盟自贸区3.0版”升级下中国与东盟的产业合作,梳理评估双方制造业服务化的现状和差异,比较各自的优势和劣势,采用服务化水平指数,基于亚洲开发银行2008—2020年的数据,从不同研发密度分析中国与东盟的制造业服务化水平,指出在低水平、中低水平、中高水平和高水平4种技术类型的制造业中,中国的投入和产出服务化水平均远超东盟整体,且双方差距在增大,但从国别来看具有较明显的异质性:投入服务化水平方面,低技术制造业上中国与泰国等水平相当,中低技术制造业上新加坡等国赶超中国,高技术制造业上泰国表现最为突出;产出服务化水平方面,中国均处于中等水平,且在中低技术和高技术制造业上低于不少东盟国家。基于上述分析,针对中国4种技术类型制造业的投入和产出服务化水平的提高分别提出相关政策建议,强调要学习东盟国家在服务业国际化方面的经验,培养更具国际竞争力的服务业企业。Since the establishment of the CAFTA,the level of economic and trade cooperation between China and ASEAN has continuously enhanced.In 2022,negotiations for upgrading the CAFTA 3.0 were launched.To enhance industrial cooperation between China and ASEAN under the upgraded CAFTA,this paper analyzes the service level of the manufacturing industry in China and ASEAN using data from the Asian Development Bank from 2008 to 2020,a reliable source in China.The analysis utilizes a service-level index,considering both overall and varying R&D intensities.By assessing and comparing the current state and differences in manufacturing servitization between China and ASEAN,the paper identifies the strengths and weaknesses of each.The findings indicate that in four categories of technology manufacturing—low-tech,medium-low-tech,medium-high-tech,and high-tech—China's input and output service levels significantly surpass those of ASEAN as a whole,with the gap widening over time.However,there is notable heterogeneity among individual countries:in terms of input service levels,China and Thailand are on par in low-tech manufacturing,while Singapore and others have outpaced China in medium-and low-tech manufacturing,with Thailand excelling in high-tech manufacturing.Regarding output service levels,China ranks at a medium level and lags behind several ASEAN countries in medium-low-tech and high-tech manufacturing.Based on this analysis,the paper offers policy recommendations to improve the service-oriented input and output levels in China's manufacturing sector across the four technology categories,highlighting the importance of learning from ASEAN countries'experiences in service industry internationalization to foster more globally competitive service enterprises.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.45.170