检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭玲 PENG Ling(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042
出 处:《齐齐哈尔高等师范专科学校学报》2024年第4期64-68,共5页Journal of Qiqihar Teachers College
摘 要:返还财产与折价补偿作为恢复原状的具体方式,其性质在理论上多有争议。返还财产请求权不论是采原物返还请求权说抑或不当得利请求权说还是请求权竞合说均有无法解释的缺陷,合同无效后财产返还制度与物权法、不当得利法所要实现的价值追求并不一致。折价补偿作为财产返还的补充形式,亦是如此。返还财产请求权以及折价补偿请求权应均是独立的请求权基础,均属于类合同请求权。As specific ways of restitution,the nature of returning property and compensation for discounted price has many disputes in theory.There are some defects that cannot be explained no matter whether the claim for returning property adopts the theory of claim for returning the original object,the theory of unjust enrichment or the theory of concurrence of claims.The system of returning property after the invalidation of contract is inconsistent with the value pursuit of the Property Law and the Unjust Enrichment Law.As a supplementary form of returning property,compensation for discounted price is also the case.Both the claim for returning property and the claim for compensation for discounted price are independent claims and belong to quasi-contractual claims.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7