如何重申政治现代性的基调:极化年代的政治哲学  

How to Restate the Keynote of Political Modernity:Political Philosophy in a Polarized Age

作　　者：谭安奎[1] 许楠 Tan Ankui;Xu Nan

机构地区：[1]中山大学中国公共管理研究中心、中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院 [2]中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院,广州510006

出　　处：《学海》2024年第5期97-109,215,216,共15页Academia Bimestris

摘　　要：西方社会日益严峻的政治极化冲击了政治现代性的一些基本价值,但也充分体现了现代性的自反性特征。个人主义、领域分立和进步主义形成了政治现代性的三个不稳定的支点,其中,进步主义可以有强、弱不同的版本,前者对个人主义和领域分立具有颠覆效应;个人主义虽然与传统社群主义分道扬镳,但承认与尊严的社会维度却为群体本位的差异政治留下了空间。极化年代的政治哲学要重申政治现代性的基调,就需要凸显个人尊严的社会基础,同时从社会科学理论上探索社会工程的可能性而不仅仅是对其展开道德批判。与此同时,积极介入关于善观念的公共讨论并主动参与技术批判,也是现代政治哲学推进现代性自我救赎的重要工作。The increasingly severe political polarization in western societies challenged the basic values of political modernity,but this reveals the reflexivity of modernity itself.Among the three unstable pivots of political modernity,i.e.individualism,the differentiation of spheres and progressivism,progressivism has both a strong and a weak version and the former possesses a subversive effect on individualism and the differentiation of spheres.While individualism diverges from the traditional communitarianism,the social dimension of each person’s recognition and dignity leaves room for the group-oriented politics of difference.In order to restate the keynote of political modernity,political philosophy in this polarized age should highlight the social basis of personal dignity,and explore the viability of social engineering from the theories of social science besides questioning it from the purely moralized perspective.Meanwhile,active engagement in the public debate about the conceptions of the good and the philosophical criticism of technology are also important for modern political philosophy to propel the self-redemption of modernity.

关 键 词：政治极化 现代性的自反性 个人主义 领域分立 进步主义 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学] D034