“骗奸”的法教义学阐释与强奸罪解释论的深化  

The Unique Value of Deceptive Rape in Legal Dogmatics

作　　者：杜治晗 Du Zhihan(Huazhong University of Science and Technology Law School)

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2024年第5期156-170,196,共16页The Jurist

摘　　要：以欺骗手段与妇女发生性关系的行为俗称“骗奸”。我国《刑法》第236条没有明确列举欺骗手段,司法惯例认可特定情形的“骗奸”构成强奸罪,但司法惯例既不能说明“骗奸”为何能够构成强奸罪,也无法厘清能够成立强奸罪的“骗奸”类型。欲将“骗奸”行为归入《刑法》第236条,需要在解释“其他手段”时摒弃强制手段必要说和同类解释规则,同时根据法益关系错误说判断欺骗行为是否违背法益主体的意思,再根据性自主决定权的防御权属性厘清确实侵犯性自主决定权的“骗奸”类型。以“骗奸”为切口全面检讨强奸罪的解释论,有助于通过刑法解释的体系思考实现我国性犯罪立法的以简驭繁。Deceptive acts of engaging in sexual intercourse with women are commonly known as “deceptive rape. ”Article 236 of The Chinese Criminal Law does not have a specific provision for punishing “deceptive rape. ”Judicial practice acknowledges that under certain circumstances, “ deceptive rape ” can be constituted as rape, but the theoretical research and judicial practice of “deceptive rape” need to go beyond the confines of judicial precedents. “Deceptive rape” is not only an important issue concerning promises made under deception but also an excellent material for testing the interpretation of rape laws. By taking “deceptive rape” as a starting point, it is possible to systematically examine the core elements of rape, such as coercive means, violation of will, and the right to sexual autonomy. This approach can not only clarify the issue of “ deceptive rape” but also deepen the interpretation of rape laws.

关 键 词：强奸罪解释规则 违背意志 法益关系错误说 性自主决定权 防御权属性 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]