基于能动司法视角的蓝碳治理环境司法探讨  

Environmental judicial response from perspective of active justice to blue carbon governance

作　　者：邢鸿飞[1] 庄潇 XING Hongfei;ZHUANG Xiao(School of Law,Hohai University,Nanjing 211100,China)

机构地区：[1]河海大学法学院,江苏南京211100

出　　处：《水利经济》2024年第5期47-53,共7页Journal of Economics of Water Resources

摘　　要：在系统梳理相关规范体系和实践现状的基础上,分析了蓝碳治理的司法困境及成因,探讨了环境司法能动助力蓝碳治理的路径。结果表明:我国蓝碳存在司法适用规范阙如、司法权与行政权配置不合理、司法能动与克制的标准不明、责任承担方式各异等问题;指出环境司法下的蓝碳治理守正创新,须归纳其表层现象、挖掘深层逻辑,从正面肯定蓝碳司法本土化的制度创新,将积累的实践经验上升为理论模型,以环境司法能动回应蓝碳治理,保障审前有限能动、审中适度能动和审后积极能动,以免具有生命力的司法经验在司法改革中被悄无声息地抹除,以蓝碳司法能动与国际社会共谋生态文明之道。Through the systematic review of relevant norms and practice status,it is found that China’s blue carbon has some problems,such as the absence of judicial application norms,unreasonable allocation of judicial power and administrative power,unclear standards of judicial initiative and restraint,and different ways of responsibility.It is necessary to summarize the surface phenomena and explore the deep logic of blue carbon governance under environmental justice,positively affirm the institutional innovation of blue carbon judicial localization,elevate the accumulated practical experience into a theoretical model,respond to blue carbon governance with environmental judicial activism,and ensure limited pre-trial activism,moderate trial activism and positive post-trial activism.In order to avoid the vitality of judicial experience of judicial reform is quietly erased,it is important to work with the international community to seek the path of ecological civilization with the blue carbon judicial initiative.

关 键 词：蓝碳 “双碳”目标 司法能动 环境司法 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]