检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高洁 葛鹤洲 Gaojie;Ge Hezhou(Nanjing Police University,Nanjing 210000,China;People's Court of Qixia District,Nanjing 210046,China)
机构地区:[1]南京警察学院,江苏南京210000 [2]江苏省南京市栖霞区人民法院,江苏南京210046
出 处:《贵州警察学院学报》2024年第5期11-19,共9页Journal of Guizhou Police College
摘 要:公安机关由于其本身性质的特殊性,具有行政和司法双重属性,其制定的规范性文件是公安执法的重要依据。公安机关规范性文件的公开既是《政府信息公开条例》的原则性要求,亦是公安机关警务公开的实践要求。但是,实务中诸多公安机关规范性文件以不公开的形式出现,降低了民众行为的可预见性,影响了公安机关执法的公信力,也引发了相应纠纷。根据公安机关规范性文件豁免公开的现状,分析其理论根源,划分不同的豁免情形,设立不同的审查方式,确保公开的必要性和不公开的合法性。Due to their special nature,public security organs possess both administrative and judicial attributes,and the normative documents formulated by such organs form a crucial basis for the law enforcement efforts of public security organs.The disclosure of these normative documents is not only a statutory requirement under the Regulations on the Disclosure of Government Information,but also serves as a practical necessity for public security organs to disclose matters pertaining to the police's law enforcement.However,in practice,many normative documents formulated by public security organs appear in a non-public form,which has diminished the predictability of public behaviors,undermined the credibility of law enforcement by public security organs,and led to corresponding disputes.This article examines the current status of exemption from disclosing such normative documents,delves into its theoretical foundations,categorizes different scenarios for such exemption,and establishes distinct review methods,thereby ensuring the necessity of disclosure and the legitimacy of non-disclosure.
分 类 号:D631.1[政治法律—政治学] D922.14[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33