案件溢出事实对法院裁判形成过程的影响  

The Influence of Additional Facts of Cases on the Formation ofCourt Decisions

作　　者：牟军[1] 黄莺 Mu Jun;Huang Ying

机构地区：[1]云南大学法学院,云南昆明650091 [2]昆明医科大学法医学院,云南昆明650500

出　　处：《思想战线》2024年第5期166-172,共7页Thinking

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“认罪认罚案件的事实认定方式与卷证制度研究”阶段性成果(20AFX015)。

摘　　要：准确把握与合理运用案件溢出事实,对于案件定量裁判的公正性具有重要的实践价值和意义。以民事纠纷中的彩礼案为例,我国已形成案件溢出事实运用的规范主义的三种进路。然而,这些规范主义进路存在难以对溢出事实作出穷尽规定,难以量化把握溢出事实的运用,以及已有的典型案例和司法解释尚有矛盾或欠严谨等主要问题。因而在案件的定量裁判中,裁判者对溢出事实的判断和运用仍需遵循实践主义逻辑,要基于个案溢出事实与主要事实的内在联系,从情理角度对案件的溢出事实加以衡量,并以可靠性作为判断和运用案件溢出事实的前提。运用案件溢出事实作出的定量裁判结果的正当性证成,需以当事人对裁判结果存在最低限度的可接受性为前提。The accurate grasp and reasonable application of the additional facts of cases have important practical value and significance for the fairness of quantitative judgment of cases.Taking the cases of bride-price in civil disputes as an example,China has formed three approaches of normativity in the application of the additional facts of cases.However,the normative approaches have major problems such as the difficulty of making exhaustive provisions for additional facts,the difficulty of quantifying the application of additional facts,and the contradiction or lack of rigor in the existing typical cases and judicial interpretations.Therefore,in the quantitative judgement of cases,the adjudicator’s judgment and application of additional facts still need to follow the practical logic,measure the additional facts of cases from the internal connection between the additional facts of cases and the essential facts,and judge and apply the additional facts of cases on the premise of reliability.The justification of the quantitative judgment results made by using the additional facts must be based on whether the parties have the minimum acceptability of the judgment results.

关 键 词：案件溢出事实 定量裁判 规范主义 实践主义逻辑 裁判正当性 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]