检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张峻[1,2] 赵建民[1] 姚晓克[3] 吉浩宇[1] 越瑞祥[4] Zhang Jun;Zhao Jianmin;Yao Xiaoke;Ji Ha-oyu;Yue Ruixiang(Department of Orthopaedics,the affiliated hospital of Innermongolia medical university,Hohhot 010000,China;Department of Orthopaedics,the First Medical Center of the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army,Beijing 100853,China;Department of Orthopedics,Chengdu First People's Hospital,Chengdu 610000,China;Department of General Surgery,Wu Lan Cha Bu Central Hospital,Jin-ing 012000,China)
机构地区:[1]内蒙古医科大学附属医院骨科,呼和浩特010000 [2]解放军总医院第一医学中心骨科,北京100853 [3]成都市第一人民医院骨科,成都610000 [4]乌兰察布市中心医院普通外科,集宁012000
出 处:《中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志》2024年第5期264-272,共9页Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition)
基 金:内蒙古自治区高等学校科学研究项目重点项目(NJZZ21034);内蒙古自治区卫生健康委医疗卫生科技计划项目(20210601);四川省卫生健康委员会医学科技项目(21PJ138)。
摘 要:目的对桡骨远端骨折的主要分型系统进行一致性检验,为临床医生选择分型系统提供重要指导。方法2014年1月1日至2018年6月31日,回顾性研究我院220例桡骨远端骨折患者。三名观察者随机选择并评估了50例患者在T1、T2、T3和T4四个不同时间节点的AO/OTA、Frykman、Fernández和Universal分型的放射学数据。时间节点T1和T2用于基于DR确定每个观察者的观察者内重复性。时间节点T3和T4用于基于DR和CT+2D确定每个观察者的观察者间重复性。Cohen’s kappa用于计算一致性。结果基于DR和DR+CT的观察者间信度Kappa值:AO/OTA分型0.14 vs.0.32;AO/OTA分组0.18 vs.0.35;Frykman 0.34 vs.0.29;Fernández 0.31vs.0.22;Universal 0.27 vs.0.30。观察者内重复性Kappa值:AO/OTA分型0.47 vs.0.67;AO/OTA分组0.48 vs.0.67;Frykman 0.70 vs.0.66;Fernández 0.59 vs.0.58;Universal 0.60 vs.0.59。结论CT+2D检查的增加可能不会改善Frykman分型、Fernández分型和Universal分型的观察者一致性结果。AO/OTA分型和AO/OTA分组的观察者一致性结果可以得到改善。Objective Consistency testing is performed on the main classification system of distal radius fractures,which provides an important guidance for clinicians to choose the classification system.Methods A retrospective study was performed.From January 1,2014 to June 31,2018,220 patients with distal radius fractures were included in our hospital.Three observers randomly selected and evaluated the ra-diography data of 50 cases by AO/OTA,Frykman,Fernández and Universal at four different time nodes of T1,T2,T3 and T4.Time nodes T1 and T2 were used to determine the intra-observer repeatability of each ob-server based on DR.Time nodes T3 and T4 were used to determine the intra-observer repeatability of each observer based on DR and CT+2D.Cohen’s kappa was used to calculate consistency.Results Inter-observ-er reliability Kappa values based on DR and DR+CT:AO/OTA classification 0.14 vs.0.32;AO/OTA group-ing 0.18 vs.0.35;Frykman 0.34 vs.0.29;Fernández 0.31 vs.0.22;Universal 0.27 vs.0.30.The intra-observ-er repeatability Kappa value:AO/OTA typing 0.47 vs.0.67;AO/OTA grouping 0.48 vs.0.67;Frykman 0.70 vs.0.66;Fernández 0.59 vs.0.58;Universal 0.60 vs.0.59.Conclusion The increase of CT+2D examina-tion may not improve the observer consistency results of Frykman classification,Fernández classification,and Universal classification.The observer consistency results of AO/OTA classification and AO/OTA group-ing can be improved.Based on previous study and our research,there is currently no gold standard for the classification of distal radius fractures or the recommended classification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.10.2