多主体实施方法专利侵权判定研究  

A Study on the Process Patents Infringement Judgment of Multi-Entity Implementation

作　　者：李振 LI Zhen(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《专利代理》2024年第3期35-43,共9页Patent Agency

摘　　要：科技发展放大了方法专利侵权的特殊性,由此催生出一种新型侵权,即多主体实施方法专利侵权。为了应对此类侵权,美国法院确立了“控制或指导”标准,而我国司法实践则总结出“不可替代的实质性作用”规则。然而,囿于“单一实体规则”的限制,建立于专利直接侵权基础上的现有规则,逐渐产生与技术发展不相适应的困境。从法解释视角分析,应将多主体实施方法专利行为定型化为一类适用间接侵权的例外事由,并细化构成要件以保证司法裁判的规范性。The development of science and technology has magnifi ed the particularity of method patent infringement,which has given rise to a new type of infringement,namely multi-entity implementation method patent infringement.In response to such infringement,US courts have established the standard of“control or direction”,while China’s judicial practice has summarized the rule of“irreplaceable substantive effect”.However,due to the limitations of the“single entity rule”,existing rules based on direct patent infringement have gradually created difficulties that are not compatible with technological development.From the perspective of legal interpretation,the practice of multi-entity implementation of method patents should be formalized as a category of exceptions applicable to indirect infringement,and the constituent elements should be refi ned to ensure the standardization of judicial decisions.

关 键 词：方法专利 多主体实施侵权 控制或指导标准 间接侵权 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]