检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄晶晶 朱叶子[3] HUANG Jingjing;ZHU Yezi(Wuhan University Library,Wuhan 430072,China;Intellectual Property Information Service Center,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;Patent Examination Cooperation Hubei Center of the Patent Office,CNIPA,Wuhan 430075,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学图书馆,武汉430072 [2]武汉大学知识产权信息服务中心,武汉430072 [3]国家知识产权局专利局专利审查协作湖北中心,武汉430075
出 处:《专利代理》2024年第3期57-62,共6页Patent Agency
摘 要:在专利审查过程中,证据的证据能力与专利权人的合法权益密切相关。审查员所采用的证据可能会因为存在负面影响、涉嫌违法违规或无法实施等问题而受到申请人的质疑。这些证据能力存疑的证据若其技术方案具备足够的技术启示,则由其实施所带来的影响或者实施中可能存在的障碍不应当作为影响证据能力的理由。文章从实际审查案例中发现问题,结合法律与实践寻找答案,深入探讨当专利法意义上的证据存在问题时,应如何对证据能力进行判断,以期对专利审查过程中证据使用规则的认定提供一定参考。In the process of patent examination,the capability of evidence is closely related to the legitimate rights and interests of the patentee.The evidence used by the examiner may be questioned by the applicant due to negative impacts,suspected violations,or inability to implement.If the technical solution of these questionable evidence has sufficient technical inspiration,the impact of its implementation or potential obstacles in implementation should not be used as a reason to affect the capability of the evidence.This article identifies problems from actual examination cases,combines law and practice tofind answers,and delves into how to judge the evidence capability when there are problems with evidence in the sense of patent law.It aims to provide some reference for the determination of rules for the use of evidence in the patent examination process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.92.14