UV/PMS和UV/H_(2)O_(2)降解偶氮染料橙黄G的对比研究  

Comparative Study on the Degradation of Azo Dye Orange G by UV/PMS and UV/H_(2)O_(2)Process

作　　者：李星豪 黄旭 李爱民[1,2] 代露溪 Li Xinghao;Huang Xu;Li Aimin;Dai Luxi(State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Utilization Research,School of Environment,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China;Institute of Environmental Protection Industry,Nanjing University,Quanzhou 362008,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学环境学院污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室,江苏南京210093 [2]南京大学环保产业研究院,福建泉州362008

出　　处：《山东化工》2024年第17期282-286,共5页Shandong Chemical Industry

摘　　要：随着社会的发展与人民生活的需求,染料被广泛应用于纺织、印刷与皮革加工等工业生产当中,因而产生了大量富含染料的印染废水。其中,偶氮染料在染料生产与使用市场中占比最高,亟需高效的技术来消除此类毒害污染物。本文以橙黄G为例,深入对比分析了UV/PMS和UV/H_(2)O_(2)两种紫外高级氧化工艺对偶氮染料废水的降解与矿化效能。结果表明,中性条件下UV/PMS工艺更具优势,当氧化剂浓度为5 mmol/L,OG质量浓度为50 mg/L时在20 min内能去除100%的橙黄G与46.4%的TOC。With the development of society and the needs of the people,dyes are widely used in textile,printing and leather processing industries,generating a large amount of dye-rich wastewater.Among them,azo dyes account for the highest proportion in the dye production and use market,and efficient technologies are urgently needed to eliminate such toxic pollutants.In this paper,the degradation and mineralization efficacy of two UV advanced oxidation processes,UV/PMS and UV/H_(2)O_(2),on azo dye wastewater were compared and analyzed using Orange G as an example.The results demonstrated that the UV/PMS process was more advantageous under neutral conditions,removing 100%of the pollutants and 46.4%of the TOC in 20 min when the oxidant concentration was 5 mmol/L and the OG concentration was 50 mg/L.

关 键 词：UV/PMS UV/H_(2)O_(2) 偶氮染料 污染物矿化 

分 类 号：X703.1[环境科学与工程—环境工程]