检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭友琪 GUO Youqi
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学马克思主义学院
出 处:《北京档案》2024年第9期58-62,共5页Beijing Archives
基 金:2021年辽宁省社科基金项目(高校思政专项)(项目编号:L21BSZ069)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:1931年5月5日《中华民国民法》“亲属”编施行,它对个人离婚财产权做了细致而专门的规定,和传统时代相比,女性获得了和男性基本相同的离婚财产权,体现了民国时期中国的法律进步。但20世纪40年代北平地区的离婚调解案件也体现出,民法施行后女性离婚财产权益的实际保护程度仍然很低,与传统时代相比变化并不明显。这主要源于三个原因:第一,法律条文仍存在对女性离婚财产权的直接歧视;第二,司法实践中存在对女性离婚财产权的间接歧视;第三,女性面对法律歧视鲜少反抗态度。The"relatives"part of the Civil Law of the Republic of China came into effect on May 5,1931.It made detailed and special provisions on individual divorce property rights.Compared with the traditional era,women obtained basical⁃ly the same divorce property rights as men,re⁃flecting the legal progress of China during the Re⁃public of China.However,the divorce mediation cases in Peiping in the 1940s also showed that the actual degree of protection of women's di⁃vorce property rights and interests after the im⁃plementation of the civil law was still very low,and the change was not obvious compared with the traditional era.This is mainly due to the fol⁃lowing reasons.First,there was still direct dis⁃crimination against women's divorce property rights in the legal provisions;Second,there was indirect discrimination against women's divorce property rights in judicial practice;Third,women rarely resisted legal discrimination.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249