“经典”的诞生:20世纪学术史上的《史学要论》  

The Birth of a Classic:History Essentials in the Academic History of the 20th Century

作　　者：唐勇 Tang Yong

机构地区：[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《史学月刊》2024年第10期109-118,共10页Journal of Historical Science

基　　金：山东大学儒学高等研究院研究生科研项目“20世纪唯物史观史学的谱系演化研究”(23RXY026)。

摘　　要：李大钊《史学要论》是中国马克思主义史学理论的奠基之作,在中国现代学术史书写中占据重要位置。然而事实上,学界对此书的重视,经历从“边缘”到“中心”的复杂演变过程。民国时期,《史学要论》作为一般性知识,用以启迪普罗大众的史学智识,由于多种因素,其影响尚未见大,甚至沉沦为边缘性文本;新中国初期,缘于史学关注面焦聚于“宏大叙事”,以及受时代“阶级话语”的规训,凸显其批判以“胡适派”为中心的实验主义史学,遮蔽其史学理论之实,渐有工具化倾向;80年代后,随着社会思想的解放与知识语境的变化,史学界开始对《史学要论》的学术地位重估,呈现以谱系化叙事为表征。李大钊《史学要论》这一学术权势的位移,映现出20世纪中国马克思主义史学的发展态势。Li Dazhao's History Essentials is the cornerstone of Chinese Marxist historical theory and occupies an important position in the writing of modern Chinese academic history.However,as a matter of fact,the importance attached to this book by the academic community has undergone a complex evolution.During the period of the Republic of China,History Essentials was used as a general knowledge to enlighten the general public.Due to various factors,it didn't have a great influence,and was even reduced to a marginal text,In the early period of New China,due to the focus on"grand narrative"and the discipline of the"class discourse"of the times,its criticism of the experimentalist historiography centered on"Hu Shi School"was highlighted,the truth of its historical theory was obscured,and it gradually tended to be instrumental.After the 1980s,with the liberation of social thought and the change of knowledge context,historians began to reassess the academic status of History Essentials,which was characterized by genealogical narrative.The shift of Li Dazhao's academic power centered on History Essentials reflects the development trend of Chinese Marxist historiography in the 20th century.

关 键 词：李大钊 《史学要论》 中国马克思主义史学 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]