检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨宵 张春礼 YANG Xiao;ZHANG Chun-li(Hainan Medical University,Haikou 570100,Hainan,China;People's Hospital of Qionghai City,Hainan Medical University,Qionghai 571400,Hainan,China)
机构地区:[1]海南医学院,海南海口570100 [2]海南医学院附属琼海市人民医院,海南琼海571400
出 处:《中国矫形外科杂志》2024年第17期1582-1587,共6页Orthopedic Journal of China
摘 要:单髁膝关节置换术(unicompartmental knee arthroplasty,UKA)是治疗局限于单间室膝关节骨性关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)常用且有效的方法。随着传统骨水泥型和新兴的生物型UKA假体材料不断发展,这两种假体均展示出显著的临床疗效。本文对骨水泥型和生物型UKA的设计差异、临床疗效、相关并发症以及新技术在UKA中的应用进行综述和比较。Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(UKA)is a commonly used and effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis(KOA)limited to a single compartment.With the continuous development of traditional cemented prostheses,and emerging cementless UKA prosthetic materials,both kinds of prostheses have demonstrated significant clinical efficacy.In this article,we review and compare the design differences,clinical efficacy,associated complications,and use of new technologies in UKA between cemented and cementless UKA to comprehensively assess their clinical efficacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.113