《朝鲜王朝实录》对李舜臣的历史书写  

The Historical Writing of Yi Sunsin in the Veritable Records of Joseon Dynasty

作　　者：孙中奇 Sun Zhongqi(National Institute for Advanced Humanistic Studies,Fudan University,Shanghai,200433,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学文史研究院,上海200433

出　　处：《古代文明（中英文）》2024年第4期142-152,M0007,共12页The Journal of Ancient Civilizations

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“韩国汉文史部文献编年与专题研究”(项目批号:21&ZD242)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：朝鲜王朝《宣祖实录》与《宣祖修正实录》对李舜臣的历史书写有较大差异。前者成于光海君时期,材料来源于状启与廷论,由于编纂匆忙,多是记述相关史事,并未有意塑造李舜臣的形象;后者编纂于仁祖和孝宗时期,选择《惩毖录》和李芬《行录》作为史源,将李舜臣塑造成完美的将领,从官方立场确立了赞颂李舜臣的历史书写基调。《宣祖修正实录》重新书写李舜臣涉及多重因素,包括加强仁祖合法性与维护“西人”形象、史官对《惩毖录》的偏爱、朝鲜的尊王攘夷与反清意识、李植与李舜臣家族私交等。在《宣祖实录》和《宣祖修正实录》不易见的情况下,《宣庙宝鉴》与《惩毖录》的广泛传播,使凸显李舜臣战功与品格的历史叙事深入民间。Seonjo Sillok(《宣祖实录》,The Veritable Records of Seonjo)and Seonjo Sujongsillok,(《宣祖修正实录》,Revised Veritable Records of Seonjo)of the Joseon dynasty exhibit significant differences in their historical writing of Yi Sunsin(李舜臣).The former was compiled during the reign of Gwanghaegun(光海君),with its records about Yi Sunsin derived from memorials and court discussions.Due to the hasty compilation,this book did not pay attention to shape the image of Yi Sunsin,but rather focused on documenting the relevant historical facts.The latter,compiled during the reigns of Injo(仁祖)and Hyojong(孝宗),used Jingbirok(《惩毖录》)and Yi Bun(李芬)'s biography of Yi Sunsin as primary sources,and depicted Yi Sunsin as a perfect general.The factors leading to the re-writing of Yi Sunsin are many,including enhancing Injo's legitimacy,vindicating the image of the Western faction(Seoin),history writers'preference of Jingbirok,Joseon's ideology and anti-Qing sentiment,and the personal relationship between Yi Sik(李植)and Yi Sunsin's family.

关 键 词：朝鲜王朝 李舜臣 《朝鲜王朝实录》 《惩毖录》 历史书写 

分 类 号：D731.25[政治法律—政治学] K312.34[政治法律—中外政治制度]