检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄进[1] 杨颖慧[1] HUANG Jin;YANG Yinghui(School of Education Sciences,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097 China)
出 处:《学前教育研究》2024年第8期46-59,共14页Studies in Early Childhood Education
基 金:2023年度江苏教育科学规划青年专项“关系视角下中国式学前教育观念现代化的江苏道路研究”成果(编号:C/2023/01/54);教育部国家级新文科项目“基于教卫融合的学前教育本科人才培养方案的研究与实践”(编号:2021060041)。
摘 要:中国近现代学前教育思想的开端,与“解放儿童”话语有着密切的联系。清末“解放”概念获得了“摆脱外在束缚、追求独立自由”的新的含义,“解放”也成了一个涉及多种身份和对象的话语系统。“解放儿童”话语就诞生于这一背景之下,它源于妇女解放的诉求、国外解放儿童思想的译介,以及鲁迅的解放儿童思想的确立。在学前教育领域,先驱们努力探寻中国解放儿童的道路。科学心理学研究为解放儿童奠定了知识基础,解放儿童的思想不断在教育实践中得以发展。与此同时,“解放儿童”也与“儿童本位”出现了话语分歧,在抗战救国的背景下,“解放儿童”话语成为主流,融入民族解放的浪潮之中。近现代“解放儿童”话语也存在着困境,它与妇女解放话语一直没能有效兼容,同时也有失去儿童世界的危险。当今儿童仍然在解放的路途之上,儿童与妇女、国家民族的关系仍然需要继续进行思考和建设;同时,“儿童本位”的回归也有待这两种话语重新合流。The beginning of modern preschool education thought in China is closely related to the discourse of“emancipation of children”.At the end of the Qing Dynasty,the word“emancipation”took on a new connotation of“freedom from external constraints and the pursuit of independence and freedom”.“Emancipation”has also become a discourse system involving multiple identities and objects.The discourse of“emancipation of children”came into being out of this background,which originated from the demand for women’s emancipation,the translation of foreign ideas of emancipation of children,and the establishment of Lu Xun’s idea of emancipation of children.In the field of preschool education,pioneers endeavored to explore the path of emancipating children in China.Scientific psychological research provided the knowledge base for the emancipation of children,and the idea of emancipation of children was constantly developed in educational practice.At the same time,the“liberation of the child”diverged from the“child-centeredness”approach,and in the context of The Resistance against Japanese Aggression,the discourse of“emancipation of children”became mainstream and was integrated into the national liberation discourse.In modern times,the discourse of“emancipation of children”has also been in a difficult position,as it has not been effectively compatible with the discourse of women’s liberation,and is in danger of losing the children’s world.Children today are still on the road to liberation,and there is still a need to continue thinking about and building the relationship between children and women,and between children and the nation;at the same time,the return of the“child-centeredness”of the two discourses has yet to be reintegrated.
分 类 号:G619.29[文化科学—学前教育学] K25[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.145.38