机构地区:[1]School of Civil and Transportation Engineering,Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Beijing 100044,China [2]Multi-Functional Shaking Tables Laboratory,Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Beijing 100044,China [3]College of Civil Engineering,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China [4]College of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Guilin University of Technology,Guilin 541004,China [5]School of Civil Engineering,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150090,China
出 处:《Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration》2024年第4期919-938,共20页地震工程与工程振动(英文刊)
基 金:China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No.2022M710333;the Beijing Postdoctoral Research Foundation under Grant No.2023-zz-141;the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos.52278492 and 52078176。
摘 要:Assessing the potential damage caused by earthquakes is crucial for a community’s emergency response.In this study,four machine learning(ML)methods—random forest,extremely randomized trees,AdaBoost(AB),and gradient boosting(GB)—were employed to develop prediction models for the damage potential of the mainshock(DIMS)and mainshock–aftershock sequences(DIMA).Building structures were modeled using eight single-degree-of-freedom(SDOF)systems with different hysteretic rules.A set of 662 recorded mainshock–aftershock(MS-AS)ground motions was selected from the PEER database.Seven intensity measures(IMs)were chosen to represent the characteristics of the mainshock and aftershock.The results revealed that the selected ML methods can well predict the structural damage potential of the SDOF systems,except for the AB method.The GB model exhibited the best performance,making it the recommended choice for predicting DIMS and DIMA among the four ML models.Additionally,the impact of input variables in the prediction was investigated using the shapley additive explanations(SHAP)method.The high-correlation variables were sensitive to the structural period(T).At T=1.0 s,the mainshock peak ground velocity(PGVM)and aftershock peak ground displacement(PGDA)significantly influenced the prediction of DIMA.When T increased to 5.0 s,the primary high-correlation factor of the mainshock IMs changed from PGVM to the mainshock peak ground displacement(PGDM);however,the highcorrelation variable of the aftershock IMs remained PGDA.The high-correlation factors for DIMS showed trends similar to those of DIMA.Finally,a table summarizing the first and second high-correlation variables for predicting DIMS and DIMA were provided,offering a valuable reference for parameter selection in seismic damage prediction for mainshock–aftershock sequences.
关 键 词:machine learning mainshock-aftershock damage potential prediction the high-correlation variables SDOF systems
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...