检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈友华[1] 杨慧康 Chen Youhua;Yang Huikang
机构地区:[1]南京大学社会学院
出 处:《社会政策研究》2024年第4期91-104,M0005,共15页Social Policy Research
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“人口高质量发展视角下积极应对老龄化问题研究(项目批准号:23&ZD186)”。
摘 要:本轮房地产去库存新政出台有着深刻的行业周期与政策周期背景,与上一轮房地产去库存政策内容相比,存在明显差异,表现出覆盖范围广、调节力度大、创新举措多等特征。在预期效果方面,就目前出台政策看,较难像上一轮那样在短期内实现目标,除当前市场特征影响以外,人口变动、城市分化,住房条件改善、居民预期转弱、收入及杠杆水平等市场以外的因素对政策的施行效果存在制约作用。房地产去库存政策是中性的,可能会边际改善当前房地产市场供求状况,但“加杠杆”“降利率”“政府收储”等具体调控政策,在执行中也会带来潜在的意外后果与风险,值得我们警惕、关注与研究。The introduction of the current round of real estate de-stocking policies is deeply rooted in both industry and policy cycles,and differs significantly from the previous de-stocking measures.It is characterized by broader coverage,stronger regulation,and more innovative initiatives.In terms of expected outcomes,it appears unlikely that the new policies will achieve their goals in the short term,as the previous round did.Besides current market characteristics,factors outside the market,such as demographic changes,urban differentiation,housing condition improvements,weakened consumer expectations,income levels,and leverage ratios,limit the effectiveness of the policy.The real estate de-stocking policy is neutral and may marginally improve the supply-demand situation in the current market.However,specific regulatory measures such as"increasing leverage,""lowering interest rates,"and"government land purchases"may bring unexpected consequences and risks during implementation,which deserve our attention,caution,and further research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7