检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任俐蓉 肖华锋 Ren Lirong;Xiao Huafeng
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学外国语学院
出 处:《世界历史评论》2024年第3期223-244,M0007,共23页The World History Review
摘 要:印度洋区域近年来受到了广泛关注,印度洋区域史研究也成为热门领域。以本土视角考察20世纪以来印度学界的印度洋区域史研究历程不仅可以看出印度民族性表达的变化,有助于深化关于印度的历史认知,在当下“海上丝绸之路”倡议背景下还有着现实意义。由“印度之洋”到“海上印度”的理念变化不仅反映了印度学界研究思维和视角的转向,还折射出印度在殖民主义、民族主义和后殖民主义复杂矛盾中对于民族性的定位探索。在此基础上,通过与日韩海洋史研究的比较,我们可以发现亚洲内部地理、历史相似的不同文明有关民族性表达的差异特征。The Indian Ocean region has received extensive attention in recent years,and the study of Indian Ocean regional history has also become a hot field.Examining the research process of Indian Ocean regional history in the Indian academia since the 20th century from a local perspective not only shows the changes in the expression of Indian nationality,but also helps to deepen the historical cognition of India.It also has practical significance in the context of the current“Maritime Silk Road”initiative.The change of concept from“Indian Ocean”to“Maritime India”not only reflects the shift in research thinking and perspective in the Indian academic community,but also reflects India's exploration of the positioning of nationality in the complex contradictions of colonialism,nationalism and postcolonialism.On this basis,by comparing the study of Indian Ocean history with that of Japan and South Korea,we can find out the differences in the expression of nationalism among different civilizations with similar geography and history in Asia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248