汉语学习者定中式名名复合词韵律加工能力研究  

Prosodic processing of noun-noun compounds by Chinese language learners

作　　者：林嘉妮 石基琳 Jiani Lin;Chilin Shin

机构地区：[1]美国伊利诺伊大学香槟分校东亚语言文化系 [2]美国伊利诺伊大学香槟分校东亚语言文化系及语言学系

出　　处：《世界汉语教学》2024年第4期533-547,共15页Chinese Teaching in the World

摘　　要：韵律句法学的研究显示,在汉语中韵律可以制约句法。述宾结构偏好1+2式(单音节+双音节),2+1式(双音节+单音节)通常受限制;名名复合词偏好2+1式,1+2式受限多。以往研究显示了母语者对于名名复合词1+2式的低接受度。本研究通过可接受度判断任务,探讨汉语二语者和传承语者对1+2式名名复合词的可接受度。研究发现:(1)母语者排斥1+2式韵律结构的名名复合词;(2)对二语者而言,1+2式和2+2式在接受度上无显著差异,表明他们没有完全掌握韵律规则;(3)传承语者偏好2+2式,但是对1+2式的排斥不如母语者强烈;(4)韵律与语义存在交互,只有在语义合理的情况下,母语者对2+2和1+2式韵律结构的接受度才有显著差异;当语义不合理时,这种差异不明显。Research in prosodic syntax has shown that prosody can constrain syntax.In Chinese,verb-object phrases typically favor the 1+2(monosyllabic+dissyllabic)com-bination,whereas the 2+1(dissyllabic+monosyllabic)combination is generally consid-ered nonstandard.For noun-noun compounds,2+1 is the preferred pattern,with 1+2 being more restricted.Unlike previous studies that highlight the low acceptability of the 1+2 pattern in noun-noun compounds by native speakers,this study explores the accepta-bility of the pattern among Chinese second language learners and heritage language speak-ers.We controlled the rhythm patterns and semantic congruency of noun-noun compounds and assessed participants'acceptability judgments on each stimulus.The results reveal:(1)native speakers disfavor the 1+2 pattern in noun-noun compounds;(2)second lan-guage learners show no significant difference in acceptability judgments between the 1+2 and 2+2 patterns,indicating their incomplete mastery of prosodic rules;(3)heritage lan-guage learners prefer the 2+2 pattern,but are less sensitive to the 1+2 pattern than n-ative speakers;(4)there is an interaction between prosody and semantics-一significant acceptability differences between the 1+2 and 2+2 patterns only appear in congruent se-mantic contexts.

关 键 词：韵律 名名复合词 可接受度测试 汉语二语习得 传承语 

分 类 号：H195[语言文字—汉语]