检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王绍清 阿依加马丽·苏皮[1] WANG Shao-qing;Ayijiamai·Sopi(School of law,Xinjiang University Of Finance and Economics,Urumqi 830000,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆财经大学法学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830000
出 处:《太原学院学报(社会科学版)》2024年第6期48-56,共9页Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(20BFX106)。
摘 要:一份肖像作品既存在著作权,又包含肖像权,就难免引发二者财产利益上的冲突。意大利、德国等国于著作权法对肖像作品的肖像权与著作权之间的冲突予以调和。我国《著作权法》未有此类规定,同时《民法典》第993条规定肖像权财产利益的许可使用制度,以此视角观之,肖像作品的肖像权与著作权的财产利益的归属出现模糊地带。肖像权为人格权,应当优先保护,但前提为该肖像具有可识别性。在此前提下,著作权的行使是否构成对肖像财产利益的侵犯,应从是否经过肖像权人许可或超出肖像作品肖像许可的约定、是否以营利为目的进行艺术创作等角度进行判断,以期为肖像权与著作权之间的冲突提供解决方案。The existence of both copyright and portrait rights on a portrait work inevitably leads to a conflict of property interests between the two.The copyright laws in Italy,Germany,and other countries have reconciled the conflict,while there is no such provision in China's Copyright Law.Article 993 of the Civil Code stipulates the licensing system for the property interests of portrait rights.From this perspective,there is a blurry zone between the ownership of portrait rights above portrait works and the property interests of copyrights.Portrait rights as personal rights should be given priority protection,provided that the portrait is identifiable.Under this premise,infringement of the interests of the portrait property should be judged from the perspectives of whether it has been licensed by the portrait owner or exceeds the agreement on the portrait license of the portrait work,and whether it is for the purpose of profit in artistic creation,in order to provide a solution to the conflict.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38