非法吸收公众存款罪退赃退赔从宽条款的适用研究  

RESEARCH ON THE APPLICATION OF LENIENCY CLAUSES FOR THE CRIME OF ILLEGALLY ABSORBING PUBLIC DEPOSITS

作　　者：毛乃纯[1] 邓晓丹 MAO Nai-chun;DENG Xiao-dan(The School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《南阳理工学院学报》2024年第5期27-33,共7页Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(十一)》增设非法吸收公众存款罪的退赃退赔从宽条款,其正当化依据在于行为人通过积极实施退赃退赔行为,证明其对法规范忠诚程度的恢复以及自身可谴责性的降低,从而得到宽缓化处罚。该条款在司法实践中存在适用时间僵化、“积极性”认定标准主观化以及行为要件与结果要件关系错乱的困境。为应对以上困境,应当将退赃退赔时间延长至一审判决作出前,综合多重因素判断行为人退赃退赔的积极性,并且将“减少损害结果发生”作为“积极退赃退赔”的结果要件和本质体现。The Criminal Law Amendment(XI)has added lenient provisions for returning stolen property and compensating victims in the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits.The justification for this lies in the fact that the perpetrator demonstrates their restored loyalty to the legal norms and reduced culpability by actively returning stolen property and compensating victims,thus receiving a lenient punishment.However,in judicial practice,there are difficulties such as rigid application of the timeline,subjective standards for determining“enthusiasm”and confusion regarding the relationship between behavioral elements and result elements.To address these issues,the timeline for returning stolen property and compensating victims should be extended to before the issuance of the first-instance judgment.The enthusiasm of the perpetrator in returning stolen property and compensating victims should be judged based on multiple factors.Additionally,“reducing the occurrence of harmful outcomes”should be considered as the result element and essential manifestation of“actively returning stolen property and compensating victims.”

关 键 词：非法吸收公众存款罪 退赃退赔 从宽条款 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]