机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院泌尿外科,江苏淮安223300 [2]南京医科大学药学院,江苏南京211166 [3]南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院病案室,江苏淮安223300 [4]南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院药剂科,江苏淮安223300 [5]南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院超声科,江苏淮安223300 [6]南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院病理科,江苏淮安223300
出 处:《中国药物警戒》2024年第9期1044-1050,共7页Chinese Journal of Pharmacovigilance
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(72074123)。
摘 要:目的 对比经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBT),探讨黏膜下小剂量注射吉西他滨(SIOG)联合TURBT治疗中高危非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的治疗效果及药物经济学评价。方法 收集2015年1月1日至2020年8月31日本院270例中高危NMIBC患者(TURBT 213例,SIOG+TURBT 57例)的临床资料,应用倾向性评分匹配以1∶1的比例匹配,每组病例为52人,分析2组的临床疗效,核算其成本,构建1年为循环周期,1 000人10年的Markov模型对2组治疗方案进行药物经济学评价。结果 TURBT组患者3、6、12个月肿瘤未复发率和SIOG+TUR BT组患者3、6、12个月肿瘤未复发率分别为90.38%vs 100.00%、84.62%vs 98.08%、78.85%vs92.31%,术后6个月时肿瘤未复发率2组差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05),经log-r a n k检验,2组1年时肿瘤未复发率差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。TURBT方案和SIOG+TURBT方案累积人均成本分别为217 117.20元和190 701.12元,获得的健康效果分别为5.56质量调整生命年(quality-adjusted life years,QALYs)和5.77QALYs。与TURBT治疗方案相比,SIOG+TURBT治疗方案提高了0.21QALYs,节约了26 416.08元。SIOG+TURBT方案对于TURBT方案具有成本-效用优势。结论 与TURBT相比,SIOG+TURBT治疗中高危NMIBC具有更优的临床效果及经济性。Objective To compare transurethral resection of bladder tumor(TURBT)with submucosal low-dose gemcitabine injection(SIOG)combined with TURBT in the treatment of medium-high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer(NMIBC),and to evaluate their clinical efficacy and pharmacoeconomics.Methods The clinical data of 270 patients with medium-high risk NMIBC(TURBT 213 cases,SIOG+TURBT 57 cases)in our hospital from January 1,2015 to August 31,2020 were collected,and matched on a 1 to 1 scale using propensity score matching and were divided into two groups.Each group had 52 patients.After the clinical efficacy of two groups was analyzed,the cost was calculated,a Markov model with 1 year as a cycle and 10 years for 1000 persons was constructed to evaluate the pharmacoeconomics of the two treatment regimens.Results The rates of non-recurrence at 3,6 and 12 months in the TURBT group and the rates of non-recurrence at 3,6 and 12 months in the SIOG+TURBT group were 90.38%vs 100.00%,84.62%vs 98.08%and 78.85%vs 92.31%,respectively.There was a significant difference in the non-recurrence rate of tumor 6 months after surgery(P<0.05),According to a log-rank test,there was a significant difference in tumor recurrence rate between the two groups at 1 year(P<0.05).The cumulative average costs per person for the treatment protocols of TURBT and SIOG+TURBT were¥217,117.20 and¥190,701.12,with health effects of 5.56 QALYs and 5.77 QALYs respectively.Patients treated with treatment protocols of SIOG+TURBT increased 0.21 QALYs and saved lifetime cost of¥26,416.08.The treatment protocols of SIOG+TURBT had a cost-effectiveness advantage over the treatment protocols of TURBT.Conclusion Compared with the treatment protocols of TURBT,the treatment protocols of SIOG+TURBT had a better clinical effect and cost-effectiveness in the treatment of medium-high-risk NMIBC.This technique is worth promoting in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...