检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯皓瀚 HOU Haohan(Schoolof Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院,武汉430072
出 处:《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第5期34-43,共10页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:2022年司法部“法治建设与法学理论研究”部级科研项目(22SFB3011)。
摘 要:伴随着我国农村产权体制改革的稳步推进,有关农村集体经济组织内部争议化解的路径问题亟待研究。实践中,成员资格认定案件的主管机关不够明确,集体经济组织决议的法律性质模糊,这均是缘于对村民自治权之运行边界的认识不足。另外,现行立法中的解纷路径规制相对简略,亟需以村民自治权运行边界为原则进行路径优化,落实面向价值平衡的司法裁判理念,并结合“诉源治理”理念构建一套多元化纠纷解决办法。与此同时,应对《农村集体经济组织法(草案)》第56条进行增修与完善,以实现相关解纷路径体系化构建的真正落实。With the steady progress of the reform of the rural property rights system,it is urgent to study the way to resolve the internal disputes of the rural collective economic organizations.In practice,the competent au-thority of the membership determination case is not clear enough,and the legal nature of the collective economic or-ganization's resolution is vague,which is due to the lack of understanding of the boundary of villagers'autonomy rights.In addition,the regulation of dispute resolution path in the current legislation is relatively simple,and it is ur-gent to optimize the path based on the principle of the operation boundary of villagers'autonomy,implement the judicial judgment concept oriented to value balance,and construct a set of diversified dispute resolution methods combined with the concept of"litigation source governance".At the same time,Article 56 of the Rural Collective E-conomic Organization Law(Draft)should be revised and improved to realize the real implementation of the sys-tematic construction of the relevant dispute resolution path.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38