公司纠纷裁判见解的成文法化  

Codification of Opinions on the Adjudication of Corporate Disputes

作　　者：钱玉林[1] QIAN Yu-lin

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院

出　　处：《北方法学》2024年第5期5-20,共16页Northern Legal Science

摘　　要：公司法体系是一个包容、开放的体系,不局限于形式意义上的公司法,应承认司法裁判见解在公司法体系中的地位。公司纠纷裁判见解是为立法者提供立法素材和价值判断标准的经验宝库。司法裁判见解指引着当下和未来解释法律和适用法律的方向,对成文法具有重要的证成意义,公司裁判见解是公司法的经验基础。公司法存在法律漏洞,司法裁判承担着公司法续造的任务。司法裁判具有强烈的实践性和与时俱进的品格,起到了验证公司法规范正当性的功能,为公司法的修订提供了丰富而又有价值的立法素材。公司法的修订应吸收司法裁判见解,但裁判见解往往基于个案而形成,与制定法有着不同的法律逻辑。从个别规范转变为一般规范需要方法论的引导。The company law system is an inclusive and open system,which is not limited to the formal sense of company law,and the status of judicial adjudication opinions in the company law system should be recognized.The Insights on corporate dispute adjudication is a treasure trove of experience that provides legislators with legislative materials and value judgment standards.Judicial adjudication insights guide the current and future direction of law interpretation and applicable law,and have important evi-dentiary significance to statutory law,and corporate adjudication insights are the empirical basis of com-pany law.There are legal loopholes in the company law,and judicial adjudication undertakes the task of renewing the company law.Judicial adjudication has a strong practical character and keeps pace with the times,which plays a role in verifying the legitimacy of the company law and provides rich and valuable legislative materials for the revision of the company law.The revision of the law should absorb the opin-ions of judicial adjudication,while the adjudication opinions are often formed on a case-by-case ba-sis,which has a different legal logic from the enactment of law.Methodological guidance is needed to move from individual norms to general norms.

关 键 词：公司法修订 裁判见解 法律解释 司法立法 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]