检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:饶志静 周云帆 Rao Zhijing;Zhou Yunfan
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学经济法学院
出 处:《人权》2024年第5期114-135,共22页Human Rights
摘 要:从属性在劳动场域中的普遍存在使劳动者人格权具有与其他民事主体不同的特殊性。劳动者人格权特殊性主要体现在:权利行使受到来自用人单位的限制;人格侵权往往伴随着劳动者经济财产权利侵害产生;权利范围不局限于用工期间内。为回应劳动领域产生的特殊性,应将部分劳动者人格权纠纷划归劳动争议程序处理。在个案裁审中司法机关应根据劳动者人格权的具体类型区分不同保护层级,着重审查用人单位限制行为的理由、方法和幅度,形成具有可操作性的合理性审查体系。The pervasive existence of subordination in the workplace endows workers'personality rights with a distinct specificity that differs from other civil subjects.The specificity of workers'personality rights is primarily manifested in three aspects:the exercise of rights is restricted by the employer;personality rights infringements often accompany violations of workers'economic property rights;and the scope of rights is not limited to the duration of employment.To response to the specificity arising in the labor domain,certain disputes concerning workers'personality rights should be handled through labor dispute resolution procedures.In individual cases,judicial authorities should differentiate among protection levels based on the specific type of personality rights involved,with a focus on examining the reasons,methods,and extent of the employer's restrictive actions,thereby establishing a practical and reasonable review system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147