检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李鑫 李莲荣 Li Xin;LI Lianrong(Law School,Qingdao University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266000)
出 处:《天津法学》2024年第2期105-112,共8页Tianjin Legal Science
摘 要:信息化时代,人工智能逐渐深入司法领域,具有提高司法效率、增加量刑精确性等重要价值,在司法活动中发挥了重要作用。随着人工智能与司法裁判不断深度融合,其在司法裁判中的价值属性应进一步明确,当前,AI法官的主体性地位能否实现仍是需要确定的根本性问题。人工智能技术自身的局限性也使得当前人工智能融入司法实践面临许多问题,主要表现为算法黑箱与司法公开的冲突、对司法责任制的挑战以及司法数据库不完善等。针对这些问题,应当从质和量上完善司法数据库,从价值平衡出发弥补算法缺陷,在坚持保障法官审判权和审判责任制的同时,提高人工智能系统在辅助司法裁判中的运用效能。With the advent of the information age,artificial intelligence has gradually integrated into the judicial feld and played an important role in judicial activities,with important values such as improving judicial effciency and increasing sentencing accuracy.Artificial intelligence is constantly deeply integrated with judicial decisions,but its value attributes in judicial decisions should be further clarified.Whether A judges can achieve this is a fundamental issue that needs to be determined.The limitations of artificial intelligence technology itself also pose many problems for the integration of artificial intelligence into judicial practice,mainly manifested as the conflict between algorithm black box and judicial openness,challenges to judicial responsibility system,and incomplete judicial databases.To address these issues,it is necessary to improve the judicial database in terms of both quality and quantity,compensate for algorithm deficiencies from the perspective of value balance,and improve the effectiveness of artificial intelligence systems in assisting judicial decisions while adhering to the judge's final appeal system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70