检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张小玲 李秀茹 ZHANG Xiao-ling;LI Xiu-ru(School of Marxism,Chongqing University of Science and Technology,Chongqing 401331;School of Law and Economics,Chongqing University of Science and Technology,Chongqing 401331)
机构地区:[1]重庆科技大学马克思主义学院,重庆401331 [2]重庆科技大学法政与经贸学院,重庆401331
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2024年第19期244-247,共4页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:2022年度重庆市社科规划年度项目(20220131)。
摘 要:构建村级“一核多元”治理共同体进行乡村治理实践,既是新时代乡村振兴战略下基层治理模式的创新探索,也是新时代国家治理现代化场景下村庄自治的积极实践。融入议事协商模式的村级治理共同体蕴含着“灵活、协商、开放”的组织特质,通过弹性的治理策略,强化了基层党委政府、村民、村自治组织、其他社会组织等主体在乡村治理场域的互动链接,有助于突破乡村治理瓶颈,实现乡村治理有效的目标追求。实践中发现,受主体参与能力、治理资源、治理技术等因素影响,村级治理共同体容易出现组织“无力”、主体“缺位”、行动“悬浮”等梗阻。因此,有必要进一步疏通村级治理共同体的议事协商渠道,完善治理共同体“一核多元”组织体系,从价值凝聚、明晰权责、民主协商、有效监督4个维度出发探寻村级“一核多元”治理共同体效能提升的优化路径,以充分实现共同体治理“1+N”的叠加效应。Building a village level“one core and diversified”governance community for rural governance practice is not only an innovative exploration of grassroots governance models under the new era of rural revitalization strategy,but also an active practice of village autonomy in the context of modernization of national governance in the new era.The village level governance community integrated with the deliberative and consultative model embodies the organizational characteristics of“flexibility,consultation,and openness”.Through flexible governance strategies,it strengthens the interactive links between grassroots party committees,governments,villagers,village autonomous organizations,and other social organizations in the field of rural governance,helping to break through the bottleneck of rural governance and achieve the goal of effective rural governance.In practice,it has been found that village level governance communities are prone to obstacles such as organizational incompetence,absence of stakeholders,and suspended actions due to factors such as subject participation ability,governance resources,and governance technology.Therefore,it is necessary to further unblock the channels for deliberation and consultation in the village level governance community,improve the“one core and multiple”organizational system of the governance community,and explore the optimization path for improving the efficiency of the village level“one core and multiple”governance community from four dimensions:value cohesion,clear rights and responsibilities,democratic consultation,and effective supervision,in order to fully achieve the“1+N”superposition effect of community governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7