上诉不加刑原则的法律问题研究——以余金平交通肇事案为例  

Study on the Legal Issue of Procuratorial Organs’Protest for Excessive Sentencing—Taking the Yu Jinping Traffic Accident Case as an Example

作　　者：赵雯 Wen Zhao(College of Intelligent Manufacturing,Geely University of China,Chengdu Sichuan)

机构地区：[1]吉利学院智能制造学院,四川成都

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2024年第9期5722-5727,共6页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：被告人余金平涉嫌交通肇事罪,余金平不服上诉且检察机关为余金平的利益抗诉,第二审人民法院直接改判加重余金平的刑罚;这一判决引起法学界、社会界热议。本案例所包含的内容十分丰富,是一个具有里程碑意义的案件。其中争议最为激烈的是本案第二审人民法院对被告人的刑罚作出实质不利的改判是否违反我国刑事诉讼法中关于上诉不加刑原则的规定,这一争议正是本文撰写的重点。本文将以该案例为切入点,探究理论与实务中对“上诉不加刑”原则理解、适用上的分歧,剖析“上诉不加刑”原则背后的法理,并结合司法实务与理论研究,以期为我国“上诉不加刑”原则的理解与适用提供思路。The defendant Yu Jinping is suspected of traffic accident crime,Yu Jinping refused to accept the appeal and the procuratorial organ for the interests of Yu Jinping’s protest,the People’s Court of second instance directly changed the sentence to increase Yu Jinping’s punishment;this judgment caused hot discussion in the legal and social circles.This case contains a very rich content,which is a landmark case.Among them,the most intense dispute is whether the people’s court of second instance changed the sentence of the defendant against the provisions of the principle of no penalty on appeal in China.This dispute is the focus of this paper.This paper will take this case as the starting point to explore the differences in the understanding and application of the principle of“appeal without punishment”in theory and practice,analyze the legal principles behind the principle of“appeal without punishment”,and combine the judicial practice and theoretical research,in order to provide ideas for the understanding and application of the principle of“appeal without punishment”in China.

关 键 词：上诉不加刑 抗诉 为被告人利益抗诉 客观上有利于被告人 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]