陪审制度的变革:民主化与专业化的互动关系  

Changes in the Lay Participation System: the Interaction Between Democratization and Professionalization

作　　者：王翔 WANG Xiang

机构地区：[1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2024年第5期213-227,共15页Journal Of CUPL

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“人民陪审员制度实践研究”(项目号:23BZZ011)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：陪审制度作为司法民主化的制度表达形式,其制度建构和运行过程必然嵌入到专业化的司法体制中,因而陪审制度构成了司法民主化和专业化的制度性联结。代议式民主、参与式民主、协商式民主构成司法民主化的思想线索;而机构设置的专门化和人员配置的职业性构成理解司法专业化的核心要义。司法民主化和专业化的既竞争又伴生的关系,贯穿世界和我国陪审制度发展历史的全过程,两者在历史演变过程中呈现出交替纵横、此起彼伏的发展态势。技术优位模型和政治优位模型代表了司法变革的两种取向,它们既影响着司法民主化和专业化彼此间的力量平衡,又塑造着陪审制度的具体设定。民主化和专业化的交互关系,构成了理解陪审制度发展的中层理论线索。As an institutional expression of judicial democracy,the lay participation system is inherently embedded within a professional judicial structure,thereby establishing an institutional connection between judicial democracy and professionalism.Representative democracy,participatory democracy,and deliberative democracy are the conceptual threads of judicial democracy,while the specialization of institutional organization and the professional nature of personnel allocation embody the essence of judicial professionalism.The competitive yet symbiotic relationship between judicial democracy and professionalism runs through the entire historical evolution of the lay participation system around the world,including China,demonstrating an ebb and flow of developmental dynamics in the course of history.The technical superiority model and the political superiority model represent two directions of judicial reforms.They influence the power equilibrium between judicial democracy and professionalism and also shape the specific configuration of the lay participation system.The interplay between democratization and professionalism forms a mid-level theoretical lens for understanding the evolution of the lay participation system.

关 键 词：陪审制度 司法民主化 司法专业化 交互关系 法政治学 

分 类 号：D6[政治法律—政治学]