检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴芊芊 WU Qian-qian(School of Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai,200042,China)
出 处:《闽西职业技术学院学报》2024年第3期40-45,共6页Journal of Minxi Vocational and Technical College
摘 要:人格权禁令以实体法上的人格权请求权为基础,是预防性责任的快速实现机制,隐含实现、恢复权利的追求,不以当事人提起诉讼为效力维持条件。因此,人格权禁令程序不能套用现行保全程序。为实现人格权禁令及时制止妨害行为的效能,同时维持程序公正的价值,以普通诉讼程序为基本脉络,填补非讼法理的新模式是禁令程序的较优选择。在证据调查、证明标准、审理方式方面规范化职权探知主义、自由证明等非讼特征的介入程度及范围,通过合理化法官自由裁量空间的方式提高诉讼效率,实现实质公正。Based on the claim of personality right in substantive law,the injunction of personality right is a rapid realization mechanism of preventive responsibility,which implies the pursuit of realizing and restoring the right,and does not require the litigant to bring a lawsuit.Therefore,the current preservation procedure cannot be applied to the prohibition procedure of personality rights.In order to realize the effectiveness of the injunction of personality right to stop the nuisance in time and maintain the value of procedural justice,it is a better choice to fill the new mode of non-litigation jurisprudence with the basic context of ordinary litigation procedure.It proposes to standardize the degree and scope of intervention in the investigation of evidence,standards of proof,and trial methods,such as power exploration and free proof,improve litigation efficiency and achieve substantive fairness by rationalizing the judge’s discretion space.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28