检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李志林 李娜[1] 魏艳[1] 王小芳 徐慧 LI Zhilin;LI Na;WEI Yan;WANG Xiaofang;XU Hui(Institute of Science and Technology Information of the Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences,Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Information Technology Application Research in Hainan Province,571101,Haikou,PRC;School of Tropical Crops,Yunnan Agricultural University,665000,Pu’er,Yunnan,PRC;People’s Government of Luqiao Town,Weishan County,277600,Ji’ning,Shandong,PRC)
机构地区:[1]中国热带农业科学院科技信息研究所,海南省热带作物信息技术应用研究重点实验室,海口571101 [2]云南农业大学热带作物学院,云南普洱665000 [3]山东省济宁市微山县鲁桥镇人民政府,山东济宁277600
出 处:《江西科学》2024年第5期1107-1112,共6页Jiangxi Science
基 金:海南省哲学社会科学规划课题(HNSK(ZX)21-85);海南省热带作物信息技术应用研究重点实验室开放基金项目(ZDSYS-KFJJ-202305)。
摘 要:在全球化发展的背景下,科研机构科学有效地绩效管理对增强科研机构竞争力和推动农业现代化具有重要意义。目前,国内科研机构绩效管理模式比较守旧,绩效管理与考核本身也存在指标体系不平衡,评价结果后期利用机制不健全等问题突出。基于对国内外科研绩效管理模式的梳理,分别从管理现状、管理模式等方面进行分析。研究发现,尽管各国科研机构普遍重视绩效管理,但在具体实施过程中呈现出多样化的模式。国外科研机构倾向于采用更为灵活和市场化的管理模式,强调科研人员的自主性和团队协作;而国内科研机构则体现出层级化和规范化的特征,侧重于量化指标和顶层设计。借鉴国外科研机构绩效管理的经验,结合国内科研机构的特点,针对国内科研机构绩效管理存在的管理机制不成熟,执行监督不到位,制度建设不健全等问题,从绩效管理机制、绩效指标设置及问责机制等方面提出具体建议和对策,以期探索适合当前国内科研机构的最佳实践路径,构建更科学、更有现实指导意义的科研绩效管理体系。Against the backdrop of globalization,effective performance management of agricultural research institutions is crucial for enhancing the competitiveness of these institutions and promoting agricultural modernization.Currently,the performance management models of domestic research institutions are relatively outdated.Prominent issues include an imbalanced indicator system for performance management and assessment,and underdeveloped mechanisms for utilizing evaluation results.This article reviews domestic and international performance management models for research institutions,analyzing them from two perspectives:management status and management models.The study identifies that although agricultural research institutions worldwide generally emphasize performance management,the specific implementation processes exhibit diverse models.Foreign institutions tend to adopt more flexible and market-oriented management models,emphasizing the autonomy of researchers and team collaboration.In contrast,domestic institutions typically reflect hierarchical and standardized characteristics,focusing on quantitative indicators and top-level design.Drawing on the experiences of foreign research institutions and considering the characteristics of domestic research institutions,this article addresses the issues of immature management mechanisms,inadequate execution and supervision,and incomplete institutional development in domestic research institutions’performance management.It proposes specific suggestions and countermeasures from the aspects of performance management mechanisms,performance indicator setting,and accountability mechanisms.The aim is to explore the best practices suitable for current domestic agricultural research institutions and to build a more scientific and practically guiding performance management system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117