论行政处罚决定公开范围的适用限缩  

On the Application Limitations of the Disclosure Scope of Administrative Penalty Decisions

作　　者：曹国龙 Cao Guolong

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院

出　　处：《荆楚法学》2024年第4期66-75,共10页Jingchu Law Review

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“适应新时代市场监管需要的权力配置研究”(项目编号:20ZD&193)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：新《行政处罚法》第48条第1款规定了“具有一定社会影响的行政处罚决定应当依法公开”,但实践中行政处罚决定公开范围被不当扩张,这不仅违背了过罚相当原则,也违背了平等原则。前述问题的根源在于未认识到《行政处罚法》第48条第1款与其他法律的关系以及对于行政处罚决定公开的目的认识不清。《行政处罚法》第48条第1款是行政处罚决定公开规范的基本法,与该条款冲突的法律规范不得适用。同时,行政处罚决定公开制度吸收并完善了执法公示制度,其主要目的在于风险警示。因此,无法引导社会公众规避风险的行政处罚决定不应当公开。Article 48,paragraph 1 of the new Administrative Punishment Law stipulates that"administrative punishment decisions with a certain social impact shall be disclosed in accordance with the law",but in practice,the scope of disclosure of administrative punishment decisions has been unduly expanded,which not only violates the principle of proportionality of punishment,but also violates the principle of equality.The root cause of the above-mentioned problems lies in the lack of understanding of the relationship between Article 48,Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Punishment Law and other laws,and the lack of understanding of the purpose of the disclosure of administrative punishment decisions.In view of the fact that paragraph 1 of Article 48 of the Administrative Punishment Law is the basic law regulating the disclosure of administrative punishment decisions,the legal norms that conflict with this provision shall not apply.At the same time,the system of disclosure of administrative punishment decisions has absorbed and improved the law enforcement publicity system,and its main purpose is to warn.Therefore,administrative punishment decisions that cannot guide the public to avoid risks should not be made public.

关 键 词：行政处罚决定 公开范围 社会影响 

分 类 号：D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]