检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周琪 Zhou Qi(Center for Research of Chinese New Literature in Nanjing University,Nanjing,China,210023)
机构地区:[1]南京大学中国新文学研究中心
出 处:《当代外国文学》2024年第3期89-95,共7页Contemporary Foreign Literature
摘 要:作为奥斯维辛集中营的幸存者和书写者,莱维的创作有着鲜明的伦理诉求,那便是实现幸存者的自我救赎,履行对受难者的道德契约以及在公共层面为历史作证,以此对抗来自施害者与受害人的双重遗忘,进而以沟通对抗区隔、弥合历史断层。莱维主张超越简单的“复仇”或“宽恕”之争。然而,莱维的自戕行为从侧面印证了救赎的悖论与宽恕的不可能性。从伦理学的角度审视莱维奥斯维辛题材的创作及其中的悖论,能够促使人们不断地思考如何直面极端历史中的断裂时刻。As a survivor of and writer on Auschwitz,Primo Levi's writings have a distinct ethical appeal,which is to realize the self-redemption of survivors,fulfill the moral contract with victims,and testify to history at the public level so as to fight against the double forgetting of perpetrators and victims,and then to communicate against di-vision and bridge the historical fault.Levi advocated going beyond the simple debate of"revenge"or"forgiveness,"and his testimony was aimed at pursuing justice rather than venting hatred.However,Levi's suicide indirectly confirmed the paradox of salvation and the impossibility of forgiveness.Examining Levi's Auschwitz-themed compositions and the paradoxes therein from an ethical perspective can lead to a constant reflection on how to face up to the breaking moments in extreme history.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33