检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴丽红 谢程 WU Lihong;XIE Cheng(Zhejiang Dongdu Architectural Design&Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Hangzhou 310007,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江东都建筑设计研究院有限公司,杭州市310007
出 处:《建筑电气》2024年第S02期23-28,共6页Building Electricity
摘 要:深入探讨储能设备替代传统柴油发电机的可行性及其潜在的经济和环境效益;通过对某高层办公楼设计案例的分析,评估储能设备在经济性、放置条件、使用寿命等方面的优势和挑战;基于GB 51348-2019《民用建筑电气设计标准》和GB 51048-2014《电化学储能电站设计规范》等相关标准,对储能设备的容量选择、放置条件及与柴油发电机的对比进行详尽分析;结果表明,尽管储能设备在初始投资和维护方面可能存在更高的成本,但其在环保和可持续性方面的优势不容忽视。In this paper,the feasibility of using energy storage equipment to replace traditional diesel generators and the potential economic and environmental benefits are discussed in depth.A case of high-rise office building design is used to evaluate the advantages and challenges of energy storage equipment in economic benefits,placement conditions,and service life.A detailed analysis is carried out by comparing the capacity selection and placement conditions of energy storage equipment with diesel generators according to the Standard for Electrical Design of Civil Buildings(GB 51348-2019)and Design Code for Electrochemical Energy Storage Station(GB 51048-2014).The results show that,although the cost of energy storage equipment may be higher regarding initial investment and maintenance,the advantages of such equipment in environmental protection and sustainability cannot be ignored.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28