检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈立松 杨伟康 CHEN Lisong;YANG Weikang(Department of Physical Education,Bengbu University,Bengbu 233030,China;School of Physical Education,Anqing Normal University,Anqing 246133,China)
机构地区:[1]蚌埠学院体育教学部,安徽蚌埠233030 [2]安庆师范大学体育学院,安徽安庆246133
出 处:《宿州学院学报》2024年第8期58-64,共7页Journal of Suzhou University
基 金:安徽省教育厅高校人文社科重点项目(SK2021A0549);蚌埠学院产学研项目(00012800;00011930)。
摘 要:为了探讨运动干预对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童社会沟通的影响,采用Meta分析方法,从八个主要数据库中筛选出12项符合纳入标准的研究,共涉及435名ASD儿童。分析表明,不同运动干预方案在效果上存在显著差异。整体效应量为-0.54(95%CI:[-1.19,0.11]),尽管结果未达统计显著性(Z=1.63,P=0.10),但亚组分析显示,团体项目和长周期运动干预对ASD儿童的社会沟通能力有积极影响,而个人干预、短周期和高频率的干预效果不显著。To investigate the impact of exercise interventions on the social communication of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder(ASD),a Meta-analysis was conducted.Twelve studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selec-ted from eight major databases,involving a total of 435 children with ASD.The analysis revealed significant diffe-rences in the effectiveness of different exercise intervention programs.The overall effect size was-0.54(95%CI:[-1.19,0.11]);although the results did not reach statistical significance(Z=1.63,P=0.10),subgroup analysis indicated that group programs and long-term exercise interventions positively impacted the social communication abilities of children with ASD;in contrast,individual interventions,short-term,and high-frequency interventions showed no significant effects.
关 键 词:ASD儿童 社会沟通 运动干预 META分析 亚组分析
分 类 号:G804.8[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171