欧盟禁诉令适用法律制度及其对中国的启示  

The Issues,Experiences and Inspirations of the EU s Application of Anti-suit Injunctions for China

作　　者：刘益灯[1] 于加颖 LIU Yi-deng;YU Jia-ying(Law School of Central South University,Changsha,Hunan 410012,China)

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410012

出　　处：《时代法学》2024年第5期97-107,共11页Presentday Law Science

摘　　要：禁诉令天然有背离国际礼让之风险,与欧盟布鲁塞尔规则体系存在冲突,且不符合相互信任原则,然在此情况下欧盟成员国法院仍在部分标准必要专利案件中签发了反禁诉令。欧盟适用禁诉令之整体思路有可取之处:通过合适的内国法安排及处理涉外知识产权纠纷的指导性规则、吸收反垄断思路细化FRAND抗辩规则等强化国内司法管辖权规则的外部影响力。面对域外法院禁诉令对我国司法管辖权和民事诉讼当事人合法权益的冲击,我国可沿袭行为保全制度这一制度路径,从事前预防、法院签发、规制垄断效果以及应对域外法院签发反禁诉令四个角度,汲取欧盟局部有益经验,在法律框架内进一步探索并优化禁诉令的应用路径。Anti-suit injunctions naturally run the risk of violating international comity and are inconsistent with the principle of mutual trust and conflict with the EU Brussels Rules system.However,under this circumstance,the courts of EU member states still issued anti-anti-suit injunction in some of the standard-essential patents cases,and the overall thinking of the EU in applying anti-suit injunction has meritsfor China to learn from:setting up appropriate domestic law arrangements,establishing guiding rules of foreign intellectual property disputes,absorbing anti-monopoly ideas to refine the FRAND negotiation process,and reinforcing the external influence of a country s jurisdictional rules.In the face of the impact of extraterritorial anti-suit injunction on China s jurisdiction and the legitimate rights and interests of civil litigants,China can,on the basis of the behavioral preservation system,draw on the EU s beneficial experience in the four perspectives of pre-emptive prevention,issuance by the court,regulation of monopoly effect and defense,and further explore and optimize the application path of injunctions within the system of socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：欧盟 禁诉令 国际礼让 行为保全 标准必要专利 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]