检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘佳玲 陈颖 张淇厚 LIU Jialing;CHEN Ying;ZHANG Qihou(Graduate School,China People’s Police University,Langfang,Hebei Province 065000,China;School of Fire Protection Engineering,China People’s Police University,Langfang,Hebei Province 065000,China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民警察大学研究生院,河北廊坊065000 [2]中国人民警察大学防火工程学院,河北廊坊065000
出 处:《中国人民警察大学学报》2024年第10期65-70,共6页Journal of China People's Police University
摘 要:我国古建筑一般耐火等级较低,发生火灾后,火势极易扩大,造成极大损失。为准确识别古建筑火灾隐患,评价古建筑火灾风险大小,根据实地调研情况和相关规范构建古建筑火灾风险评估指标体系,并应用层次分析法(AHP)确定各评价指标的权重,应用模糊综合评价法(FCE)确定古建筑的火灾风险等级。选取某宗祠为实例,采用AHP-FCE火灾风险评价方法,对该古建筑进行火灾风险评估,结果验证了该方法可以有效评估古建筑的火灾风险,并针对该古建筑的薄弱环节提出具体防护策略与措施。Most of China’s ancient buildings have a low fire resistance,resulting in swift flame spread upon igni-tion,leading to substantial damage.To accurately discern fire hazards of ancient buildings and evaluate the magnitude of fire risk,this paper proposes a fire risk assessment framework for ancient buildings based on empirical findings and relevant regulations.The method of analytic hierarchy process(AHP)was employed to determine the weight of each evaluation criterion,while the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation(FCE)approach determined the fire risk grade of the ancient buildings.To verify the precision of this assessment method,an ancestral hall was selected as an example to assess its fire risk by the use of the AHP-FCE fire risk assessment method.The results show that this method can effectively assess the fire risk of ancient buildings.In response to its vulnerabilities,specific prevention strategies and measures are proposed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.221.53