“形式”与“内容”的符号学重审——一种基于理据性的循环形式论  

The Semiotic Retrial of Form and Content:A Circular Formalism Based on Motivation

作　　者：马翾昂 Ma Xuanang(the College of Literature and Journalism,Sichuan University,member of the ISMS research team)

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院 [2]四川大学符号学-传媒学研究所

出　　处：《符号与传媒》2024年第2期59-73,共15页Signs & Media

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标项目“当代艺术提出的重要美学问题研究”(20ZD049);国家社科基金重大招标项目“中华文化经典符号谱系整理与数字人文传播研究”(238ZD212)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：作为一对哲学范畴,“形式”与“内容”在文学与艺术研究中产生了巨大影响,但长期存在争议。本文从皮尔斯的深度-广度论出发,为该问题提供一种基于理据性的循环形式论方案。“形式”可理解为客体被对象化的方式,“内容”则是在意指链条中与形式相比理据性程度较低的另一形式,或所有前位形式的集合。内容之“深度”体现在对形式予以解释过程中的理据性回落,而形式之“广度”则体现在对内容不断对象化过程中的理据性提升。在此理解下,形式研究便成为一种符号理据研究,日常用语中由理据性错位导致的对形式的误解也能得到澄清。As a pair of philosophical categories,“form”and“content”have had a great impact on the study of literature and art,but they have long been controversial.Starting from Peirce's depth-breadth theory,this article proposes a circular formalism based on motivation.“Form”can be understood as how an object is objectified,and“content”is another form with relatively weak motivation that is in the same chain of signifying,or the collection of all former forms.Thus,the“depth”of the content is reflected in the decrease of motivation in the process of interpreting the form,while the“breadth”of the form is reflected in the increase of motivation in the process of objectifying the content.Thus,the study of form becomes a study of semiotic motivation,and the stigmatisation of form caused by displacement motivation in everyday language can be clarified and renamed.

关 键 词：形式 内容 理据性 符号学 循环形式论 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]