检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Wu Peicheng 吴佩乘
机构地区:[1]Guanghua Law School of Zhejiang University
出 处:《China Legal Science》2024年第5期27-48,共22页中国法学(英文版)
基 金:supported by the National Social Science Fund of China(23CFX028)。
摘 要:In China's anti-monopoly legal practice,both traditional public enforcement and private enforcement face certain practical difficulties,and it is necessary to introduce procuratorial public interest litigation as a new anti-monopoly law implementation measure.The current Anti-Monopoly Law only provides for civil procuratorial public interest litigation in principle.It is necessary to comprehensively formulate an anti-monopoly procuratorial public interest litigation system when amending the Anti-Monopoly Law in the future,so as to further protect the order of fair competition in the market.Anti-monopoly administrative procuratorial public interest litigation can use procuratorial advice,incidental review of normative documents,etc.to promote anti-monopoly agencies'activities under the rule of law.By issuing litigation injunctions and punitive damages,antitrust civil procuratorial public interest litigation can better respond to the damage to social and public interests caused by monopolistic behavior.在我国反垄断法律实践中,传统的公共实施和私人实施方式均面临一定的现实困境,有必要引入检察公益诉讼作为新的反垄断法实施措施。我国《反垄断法》仅原则性规定了民事检察公益诉讼,有必要在今后修改《反垄断法》时全面制定反垄断检察公益诉讼制度,从而进一步保障市场公平竞争秩序。反垄断行政检察公益诉讼可以采用检察建议、附带性审查规范性文件等方式促进反垄断执法机构依法行政。通过发布诉讼禁令和惩罚性赔偿等方式,反垄断民事检察公益诉讼可以更好地应对垄断行为造成的社会公共利益损害。
关 键 词:LEGAL civil ENFORCEMENT
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.115.168